A client expresses intent to harm another person. What is the nurse’s immediate legal responsibility?
Respect the client’s confidentiality
Document the statement only
Warn the intended victim and notify authorities
Administer an anxiolytic medication
The Correct Answer is C
Duty to warn is a legal and ethical obligation requiring mental health professionals to break confidentiality when a client poses a credible threat to another person. This protects public safety and involves notifying both law enforcement and the potential victim. It stems from Tarasoff case precedent and is recognized in many jurisdictions. Breaching confidentiality in this context is legally permissible and prioritized over privacy to prevent harm.
Rationale for correct answers
C. The nurse must act on the legal duty to protect others from foreseeable harm by alerting authorities and warning the threatened individual when a client makes a credible threat. This immediate action prioritizes safety over confidentiality.
Rationale for incorrect answers
A. Strictly maintaining confidentiality disregards the safety exception in cases of imminent harm to others, placing both the potential victim and the nurse at legal risk.
B. Solely documenting the statement fails to prevent danger, as it does not involve active steps to warn or protect the intended victim.
D. Administering medication addresses possible agitation but does not fulfill the legal obligation to protect third parties from credible threats of harm.
Take Home Points
- The duty to warn overrides confidentiality when a client poses a serious, credible threat to another person.
- Legal precedent from the Tarasoff case guides mental health professionals in balancing privacy with public safety.
- Warning includes notifying law enforcement and, if possible, directly informing the potential victim.
- Simply documenting or treating symptoms is insufficient without active protective measures when harm is imminent.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Nurse–patient relationship: This therapeutic bond is foundational in healthcare, fostering trust, communication, and collaboration to enhance patient outcomes. It progresses through distinct phases, each with specific goals. Trust is critical for effective care, enabling patients to share sensitive information. Respect and empathy strengthen this bond, aligning with physiological and safety needs.
Rationale for correct answers
B. The orientation phase involves initial interactions where nurses establish trust and clarify their role. This sets the foundation for collaboration, addressing the patient’s immediate needs and expectations.
Rationale for incorrect answers
A. The working phase focuses on implementing care plans, not primarily on establishing trust or defining roles.
C. The termination phase centers on concluding the relationship, reviewing progress, not initiating trust.
D. The evaluation phase is not a standard phase; it may occur within others but does not focus on trust-building.
Take Home Points
- The nurse–patient relationship is critical for patient cooperation and improved health outcomes.
- Trust is established primarily in the orientation phase through active listening and role clarification.
- Each phase—pre-interaction, orientation, working, termination—has unique goals for therapeutic progress.
- Missteps in trust-building can hinder communication, distinguishing this relationship from casual interactions.
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Duty to warn is a legal and ethical obligation requiring mental health professionals to break confidentiality when a client poses a credible threat to another person. This protects public safety and involves notifying both law enforcement and the potential victim. It stems from Tarasoff case precedent and is recognized in many jurisdictions. Breaching confidentiality in this context is legally permissible and prioritized over privacy to prevent harm.
Rationale for correct answers
C. The nurse must act on the legal duty to protect others from foreseeable harm by alerting authorities and warning the threatened individual when a client makes a credible threat. This immediate action prioritizes safety over confidentiality.
Rationale for incorrect answers
A. Strictly maintaining confidentiality disregards the safety exception in cases of imminent harm to others, placing both the potential victim and the nurse at legal risk.
B. Solely documenting the statement fails to prevent danger, as it does not involve active steps to warn or protect the intended victim.
D. Administering medication addresses possible agitation but does not fulfill the legal obligation to protect third parties from credible threats of harm.
Take Home Points
- The duty to warn overrides confidentiality when a client poses a serious, credible threat to another person.
- Legal precedent from the Tarasoff case guides mental health professionals in balancing privacy with public safety.
- Warning includes notifying law enforcement and, if possible, directly informing the potential victim.
- Simply documenting or treating symptoms is insufficient without active protective measures when harm is imminent.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
