A nurse is preparing to witness the informed consent for a patient scheduled for elective surgery. Which of the following actions should the nurse take? (Select all that apply)
Obtain verbal consent from the patient without a signed document if the patient agrees.
Verify that the patient understands the procedure and its risks.
Provide detailed postoperative care plans during the consent process.
Explain alternative treatment options that the provider did not discuss.
Witness the patient's signature on the consent form after confirming understanding.
Confirm the patient is legally competent and not under the influence of sedatives.
Correct Answer : B,E,F
Rationale:
A. Obtaining verbal consent without a signed document is incorrect because for elective surgeries, a signed informed consent form is legally required. Verbal consent alone does not meet legal or institutional standards and cannot replace the formal documentation process.
B. Verifying that the patient understands the procedure and its risks is correct because the nurse’s role in witnessing consent includes confirming that the patient has received appropriate information from the provider and comprehends the nature, purpose, risks, and benefits of the procedure. This ensures informed decision-making.
C. Providing detailed postoperative care plans during the consent process is incorrect because the nurse should not provide medical advice or substitute for the provider’s explanation. Postoperative instructions are important but are part of patient education, not the consent process itself.
D. Explaining alternative treatment options that the provider did not discuss is incorrect because the nurse does not provide or interpret treatment options. Discussing alternatives is the responsibility of the provider obtaining consent. The nurse can clarify what was explained but cannot add new medical information.
E. Witnessing the patient’s signature on the consent form after confirming understanding is correct because the nurse ensures the signature is authentic and that the patient is voluntarily consenting. This action does not involve providing medical explanations but confirms legal and ethical standards are met.
F. Confirming the patient is legally competent and not under the influence of sedatives is correct because a patient must be able to make an informed decision. The nurse verifies that the patient has the cognitive ability and capacity to provide voluntary consent, which protects both the patient and the institution legally.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Rationale:
A. Utilitarianism is incorrect because this principle evaluates actions based on the greatest good for the greatest number of people. While useful in public health or policy decisions, it does not directly address ethical dilemmas focused on the well-being or potential harm to a single patient. Applying utilitarianism in this context would prioritize outcomes broadly rather than considering the individual’s suffering and the potential for harm.
B. Fidelity is incorrect because fidelity involves being faithful to commitments, promises, and professional responsibilities. While maintaining trust and honoring the patient’s wishes are important, fidelity alone does not directly guide the ethical consideration regarding potential harm from opioid administration at the end of life.
C. Veracity is incorrect because veracity emphasizes truth-telling and honesty in communication with patients and families. While veracity is crucial in discussing prognosis, treatment options, and expectations, it does not provide guidance for decisions about actions that might unintentionally harm the patient.
D. Nonmaleficence is correct because this principle focuses on the ethical obligation to do no harm. The nurse’s concern that administering an opioid might hasten death reflects the application of nonmaleficence in clinical decision-making. In palliative care, nurses balance nonmaleficence with beneficence, the principle of promoting good, in this case, relief of suffering. The principle of double effect is often applied: if the primary intention is to relieve severe pain and suffering, the potential secondary effect of hastening death is ethically permissible, provided it is not the intended outcome.
Correct Answer is {"A":{"answers":"A"},"B":{"answers":"A"},"C":{"answers":"A"},"D":{"answers":"B"},"E":{"answers":"B"}}
Explanation
Rationale:
- Review mandatory nursing skills and competencies: This is relevant for the entire unit to ensure compliance with skill competency requirements and to promote safe client care.
- Review central line infections rates and causes: Unit-wide education is important to prevent infections, reinforce proper central line care, and improve patient outcomes.
- Review the incident of disruptive behavior: Discussing civility, teamwork, and professional communication benefits the whole team and helps prevent future conflicts.
- Meet to talk about mislabeling of laboratory specimen: This is specific to the AP who repeatedly mislabeled specimens. Addressing individually allows focused corrective action and policy review.
- Review near miss fall: This involves a specific incident with an AP; individualized coaching ensures understanding of fall precautions, proper bed/chair use, and safety protocols.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
