Put the following causes of Spinal Cord Injuries in the correct order, from highest frequency to lowest frequency.
Motor vehicle crash (MVC), fall, assault (gunshot wounds), sports injury
Fall, sports injury, motor vehicle crash (MVC), assault (gunshot wounds)
Motor vehicle crash (MVC) falls, sports injury, assault (gunshot wounds)
Fall, motor vehicle crash (MVC), sports injury, assault (gunshot wounds)
The Correct Answer is C
Rationale:
A. While this option correctly identifies motor vehicle crashes as the leading cause and falls as the second most common, it incorrectly places assault (gunshot wounds) before sports injuries. Epidemiologically, sports-related injuries occur more frequently than violent causes such as gunshot wounds. This misordering makes the option incorrect.
B. This option significantly misrepresents the frequency distribution. Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of spinal cord injuries, not falls. Additionally, sports injuries are less common than both MVCs and falls, so placing them second is inaccurate. This sequence does not reflect real-world data.
C. This option accurately reflects the most common causes of spinal cord injuries in order of frequency. Motor vehicle crashes account for the highest percentage due to high-impact trauma. Falls are the second leading cause, particularly among older adults. Sports injuries, such as diving or contact sports, are less frequent but still significant. Assaults, including gunshot wounds, are the least common among these options.
D. Although falls are a major cause of spinal cord injuries, they are second to motor vehicle crashes in overall frequency. This option incorrectly places falls as the leading cause, making the sequence inaccurate despite correctly placing sports injuries before assaults.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Rationale:
A. This is the standard definition of patient acuity levels used in triage. Nonurgent patients are stable and their conditions are not immediately life-threatening, so care can be safely delayed. Urgent patients require timely assessment and intervention to prevent worsening or complications, but they are not in immediate danger of death or serious disability. Emergent patients face immediate threats to life or limb and need rapid intervention to prevent death or permanent injury.
B. This is inaccurate because nonurgent patients have the lowest priority. In triage, emergent and urgent patients always take precedence due to the severity of their conditions. Nonurgent patients are evaluated after higher-acuity cases are stabilized. Prioritizing nonurgent cases first could delay life-saving treatment for those in critical condition.
C. While nonurgent patients can wait, they still require medical evaluation and treatment. Saying they “do not have to be seen” is misleading and could result in neglecting potentially important care. All patients, including nonurgent, need eventual assessment to prevent complications, ensure safety, and manage symptoms appropriately.
D. This misclassifies urgent patients as having an immediate threat to life. Urgent cases require prompt attention to prevent deterioration but are not immediately life-threatening. Confusing urgent with emergent could result in misallocation of resources, delaying critical care for true emergent patients.
Correct Answer is ["A","C"]
Explanation
Rationale:
A. A yellow (delayed) tag is appropriate because, although the injury is serious, the presence of distal pulses indicates adequate perfusion and no immediate life-threatening compromise. Treatment can be delayed without immediate risk to life.
B. This client is critically injured with a high risk of hemorrhagic shock and airway compromise. He requires immediate intervention and should be tagged red (immediate), not yellow.
C. Severe chest pain may indicate a life-threatening condition such as myocardial infarction or internal thoracic injury. Red tags are assigned to clients who require immediate care to survive.
D. Respiratory distress and chest trauma suggest potential life-threatening injury (e.g., pulmonary contusion). This client should be classified as red (immediate), not green (minor).
E. A scalp laceration, while it may bleed significantly, is generally not life-threatening if controlled. This client would more appropriately receive a green (minor) or possibly yellow tag, not black (expectant/deceased).
F. Full-thickness burns are severe, potentially life-threatening injuries that require urgent or emergent care depending on extent. This client would not be classified as green (minor) and would more likely be red or possibly black if injuries are unsurvivable.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
