Which falls within the parameters of the normal course of treatment of depression with ECT?
Once a week for 4 weeks
Twice a week for 4 weeks.
Once per week for six weeks
Three times per week for 6-12 treatments
The Correct Answer is D
Reasoning:
Choice A reason: Once-weekly treatments are generally insufficient to achieve the rapid therapeutic response for which Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) is indicated. This frequency is more common in maintenance ECT (m-ECT) after an initial acute series has successfully stabilized the patient’s depressive symptoms and prevented an immediate relapse of the disorder.
Choice B reason: Twice-weekly treatments are sometimes used to minimize cognitive side effects like memory loss, but the standard evidence-based protocol for the acute phase usually starts with a higher frequency to ensure a swift reduction in suicidal ideation and vegetative symptoms of major depressive disorder.
Choice C reason: A duration of six weeks with only one treatment per week would result in only 6 total treatments, which is on the very low end of the therapeutic window. Most patients require a more concentrated "loading" dose of treatments to see a significant change in neurotransmitter balance and clinical mood.
Choice D reason: The typical acute course of ECT involves 2 to 3 treatments per week. Most patients require between 6 and 12 treatments to achieve full remission or significant clinical improvement. This frequency is designed to provide a rapid antidepressant effect while monitoring the patient for side effects like temporary anterograde amnesia.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Reasoning:
Choice A reason: Ineffective coping is certainly present, as the patient is using destructive behaviors to manage their impulses or environment. However, this is a broad diagnosis and does not address the immediate, life-threatening safety concerns posed by the patient's current aggressive actions toward the staff and the clinical environment.
Choice B reason: There is no evidence in the prompt suggesting the patient intends to harm themselves. Antisocial personality disorder is more commonly associated with externalizing behaviors and aggression toward others rather than internalizing behaviors or self-mutilation, making this diagnosis secondary to the immediate threat posed to others.
Choice C reason: Impaired social interaction is a foundational characteristic of antisocial personality disorder, involving a disregard for the rights of others and social norms. While relevant for long-term treatment planning, it does not take priority over the immediate need to manage acute physical aggression and environmental destruction.
Choice D reason: Safety is always the clinical priority. The patient's active threats, destruction of property, and throwing of objects are clear behavioral indicators of imminent physical danger to staff and other patients. This diagnosis requires immediate intervention, such as de-escalation, seclusion, or restraints, to maintain a safe environment.
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Reasoning:
Choice A reason: Decisional conflict involves uncertainty about a course of action when several choices are available. While the patient is not speaking, there is no evidence in the documentation provided that this behavior stems specifically from an inability to make a choice between competing health-related options.
Choice B reason: Maladaptive defensive coping refers to a pattern of repeated projection or denial to protect oneself from perceived threats. While mutism can be a defense, the primary clinical observation documented is the physical inability or refusal to engage in the act of communication itself.
Choice C reason: This is the most accurate diagnosis because the documentation explicitly describes a total absence of speech (mutism) and a lack of non-verbal engagement (no eye contact). "Impaired verbal communication" captures the patient's inability to transmit or receive messages effectively within the therapeutic clinical environment.
Choice D reason: There is no evidence in the description (gazing upward, lack of eye contact, mutism) that suggests the patient is currently hostile, aggressive, or posing a physical threat to others. Jumping to a diagnosis of risk for violence without behavioral evidence is clinically inappropriate.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
