A 79-year-old patient reports a pain level of 3 out of 10 and states, “Don’t worry, this is just part of getting old.” What is the best response?

Rationale for Choice A: Obtain vital signs

While obtaining vital signs is important in assessing a patient's overall condition, it is not the first priority in a suspected transfusion reaction.

Vital signs can provide valuable information about the severity of the reaction, but they should not delay the immediate action of stopping the transfusion.

Delaying the cessation of the transfusion could allow for further infusion of incompatible blood or allergens, potentially worsening the reaction and leading to more serious complications.

Rationale for Choice B: Notify the registered nurse

Involving other healthcare professionals is crucial in managing transfusion reactions, but it should not precede stopping the transfusion.

The nurse should prioritize stopping the transfusion to prevent further exposure to potential triggers and then promptly notify the registered nurse for further assessment and interventions.

Timely communication with the registered nurse is essential for coordinating care and ensuring appropriate treatment measures are implemented.

Rationale for Choice C: Administer diphenhydramine

Diphenhydramine, an antihistamine, can be used to treat allergic reactions, but it should not be administered as the first response in this scenario.

The priority is to halt the infusion of the blood product that is potentially causing the reaction.

Administering diphenhydramine before stopping the transfusion could mask the symptoms of the reaction, making it more difficult to assess its severity and progression.

Rationale for Choice D: Stop the transfusion

This is the correct and most immediate action to take when a patient develops itching and hives during a blood transfusion.

These symptoms are indicative of a possible allergic or transfusion reaction, and stopping the transfusion is essential to prevent further complications.

It's critical to act quickly to minimize the amount of incompatible blood or allergens that enter the patient's circulation.

By stopping the transfusion, the nurse can potentially prevent the reaction from worsening and safeguard the patient's well- being.

Choice B rationale:

Checking the patency of the tubing is the first and most crucial step in addressing the lack of urinary output in this patient. Here's a detailed explanation of why this is the priority action:

Addresses the Most Likely Cause: Obstruction of the urinary catheter tubing is the most common and easily reversible cause of sudden cessation of urinary output in a patient with a continuous bladder irrigation system.

Prevents Complications: A blocked catheter can lead to a number of serious complications, including: Bladder distention, which can cause pain, discomfort, and potential bladder damage.

Urinary retention, which can increase the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and kidney damage. Hematuria, or blood in the urine, due to clot formation in the bladder or catheter.

Non-Invasive Intervention: Checking the tubing is a simple, non-invasive procedure that can quickly identify and resolve the issue without requiring further interventions or delays in care.

Prioritizes Patient Safety: It's essential to promptly address any potential urinary obstruction to prevent the aforementioned complications and ensure patient safety.

Rationale for Other Choices:

Choice A: Administering a prescribed analgesic:

While pain management is important, it does not directly address the lack of urinary output. Pain medication would be appropriate if pain were assessed to be the cause of the decreased output, but it's not the first priority in this situation.

Choice C: Notifying the provider:

Although the provider should be informed of the situation, checking the tubing for patency is a necessary first step to gather more information and potentially resolve the issue quickly without requiring further intervention.

Choice D: Offering oral fluids:

Increasing fluid intake might be helpful in some cases of decreased urinary output, but it's not the priority action in a patient with a continuous bladder irrigation system and a potential catheter obstruction.