The nurse has an order for 27 mg of Augmentin three times daily for a 6-year-old.

The pharmacy sends a vial labeled 20 mg/1 mL when reconstituted with 2.3 mL of saline.

How many mL will the nurse administer per day?

Choice C rationale:

In this situation, the nurse should continue to teach the patient about his medications despite his disinterest. It is essential for the patient to be knowledgeable about his own medications, as he will be responsible for taking them once discharged. While involving family members in the teaching process can be beneficial, the primary responsibility lies with the patient. Documenting the patient's request is also important for the record, but it does not replace the need for the patient to be informed about his medications.

Choice A rationale:

Reminding the patient of his responsibility is a good initial approach, but it should be followed by continued teaching to ensure the patient understands his medications thoroughly.

Choice B rationale:

Documenting the patient's request is important, but it does not address the patient's lack of interest in learning about his medications. The nurse should still provide education to the patient.

Choice D rationale:

Asking the patient why his wife knows about his medications is confrontational and may not be well-received by the patient. It does not address the primary issue, which is the patient's disinterest in learning about his medications.

Choice A rationale:

Statements provided by the patient's family are not a reliable defense against nursing negligence. While family statements can offer context, they may not always be accurate or objective. Legal defenses require concrete evidence and accurate documentation.

Choice B rationale:

Accurate documentation by the nurse is the best defense against allegations of nursing negligence. Thorough and precise documentation provides a clear account of the patient's condition, the care provided, and the patient's response. Proper documentation is essential for legal and ethical reasons and serves as a valuable defense in case of legal disputes.

Choice C rationale:

Testimony of other nurses may support the case but may not be as reliable as accurate documentation. Nurse testimony can be subjective and may vary, making it less robust as a defense compared to comprehensive and detailed documentation.

Choice D rationale:

Inclusion of expert witnesses can be helpful, but their testimony is most effective when combined with accurate documentation. Expert witnesses can provide specialized knowledge and opinions, but their credibility is enhanced when supported by thorough and precise nursing documentation.