A nurse in an outpatient setting is caring for a client.
The client presents with feelings of anxiety and depression.
They recently started smoking marijuana as that is what their "new friends do all the time". They admit to using laxatives frequently and running for 1 hr after eating a very large meal, which happens at least 9 times a week.
They were recently arrested for stealing make-up from a local department store and acknowledge that this "is the first time I was caught". Complete the diagram by specifying what condition the client is most likely experiencing, 2 actions the nurse should take to address that condition, and 2 parameters the nurse should monitor to assess the client's progress.

Rationale:

Choice A: Avoid discussing past behaviors with the client is incorrect. While avoiding dwelling on the past is important, discussing past manipulative behaviors in a safe and therapeutic environment can help the client gain insight into their patterns and triggers. This awareness is crucial for developing future coping mechanisms and preventing further manipulation.

Choice C: Allow manipulation so as to not raise the client's anxiety is incorrect. Allowing manipulation reinforces the behavior and undermines the client's well-being. It also sets a dangerous precedent for interactions with others.

While addressing anxiety is important, it should not be at the cost of condoning manipulation.

Choice D: Bargain with the client to discourage manipulative behavior is incorrect. Bargaining implies making concessions in exchange for the client stopping their manipulation. This approach can be ineffective and even reinforce the manipulative behavior as the client learns to negotiate for desired outcomes. Instead, clear boundaries and consistent consequences are more effective in addressing manipulation.

Rationale for Choice B:

Instituting consequences for manipulative behavior provides a clear and consistent response to the client's actions. This can help to limit the behavior and encourage the client to develop alternative coping mechanisms.

Consequences should be:

Fair and proportional: The consequence should be related to the specific manipulative behavior and not be overly harsh or punitive.

Consistent: The same consequence should be applied each time the manipulative behavior occurs. This predictability helps the client understand the cause-and-effect relationship between their actions and the consequences.

Enforceable: The consequence should be something that can be realistically implemented and followed through on. While implementing consequences, it's important to:

Maintain a therapeutic relationship: Address the behavior in a calm and professional manner, focusing on the behavior itself and not personal attacks.

Communicate clearly: Explain the consequences to the client in advance and ensure they understand the connection between their actions and the outcome.

Provide alternative coping mechanisms: Offer the client support and guidance in developing healthier ways to express their needs and manage their emotions.

By setting clear boundaries and consistently implementing consequences, nurses can help clients with manipulative behaviors learn to interact in a more positive and productive way. This ultimately benefits the client, their relationships, and their overall well-being.

Choice A rationale:

Dismissive and unsupportive: This response discounts the client's son's feelings of guilt and obligation toward their parent. It also implies that the client's son's presence is not valuable, which could further increase their distress.

Undermines the client's son's role as a caregiver: It suggests that the client's son has no responsibilities or ability to contribute to their parent's care, which could diminish their sense of agency and potentially lead to resentment or regret.

Fails to address the underlying emotions: It does not acknowledge the client's son's internal conflict and emotional turmoil, which is essential for providing effective support.

Choice C rationale:

Offers a practical solution, but may not address the core issue: While calling the children could provide temporary reassurance, it may not fully alleviate the client's son's feelings of guilt or anxiety about leaving their parent.

May not be feasible or sufficient: The client's son may need more than a phone call to feel comfortable leaving, and they may not be able to reach their children immediately.

Could be perceived as dismissive: It could suggest that the nurse is minimizing the client's son's concerns and not fully understanding their emotional needs.

Choice D rationale:

Reassuring, but may not address the client's son's guilt: While it provides assurance about the client's care, it does not directly acknowledge or validate the client's son's feelings of guilt or obligation.

Focuses on the client's care, but not the client's son's needs: It prioritizes the physical care of the client, but may overlook the emotional needs of the client's son, who is also a primary stakeholder in the situation.

May not be enough to alleviate the client's son's concerns: The client's son may still feel responsible for their parent's well- being, even with reassurance from the nurse.

Choice B rationale:

Empathetic and validates the client's son's feelings: It directly acknowledges the client's son's conflicting emotions and demonstrates understanding of their difficult situation.

Promotes self-reflection and exploration: It encourages the client's son to further express their feelings and explore their options, which can lead to greater clarity and self-awareness.

Facilitates decision-making: It helps the client's son to weigh their priorities and make a decision that aligns with their values and responsibilities, ultimately empowering them to take action.

Strengthens the therapeutic relationship: It demonstrates the nurse's ability to connect with the client's son on an emotional level, building trust and rapport.