A nurse is assessing a client who has a diagnosis of conversion disorder. Which of the following is an expected finding?

Choice A rationale:

Manifestations of seizure activity are not a common adverse effect of clonazepam. In fact, clonazepam is often used to treat seizures. It is a benzodiazepine that works by decreasing abnormal electrical activity in the brain.

While it is possible for clonazepam to worsen seizures in some individuals, this is not a typical response. Therefore, it is not the most important adverse effect for the nurse to monitor.

Choice B rationale:

Decreased urine output is not a known adverse effect of clonazepam.

Some medications can affect kidney function and urine output, but clonazepam is not one of them. Therefore, it is not necessary for the nurse to monitor urine output in a client taking clonazepam. Choice C rationale:

Inability to recall events, also known as amnesia, is a common adverse effect of clonazepam.

Clonazepam can impair short-term memory, making it difficult for people to remember things that happened recently.

This can be a significant problem for clients who need to be able to recall important information, such as instructions from their healthcare providers.

Therefore, it is important for the nurse to monitor clients taking clonazepam for signs of amnesia.

Choice D rationale:

An increase in white blood cell count is not a known adverse effect of clonazepam. In fact, clonazepam can sometimes cause a decrease in white blood cell count.

However, this is a rare side effect and is not typically something that the nurse would need to monitor.

Choice A: Lock the doors to the unit and secure windows so they cannot be opened: While removing potential means of self-harm from the environment is a safety precaution, it is not the most immediate or effective intervention for a client actively experiencing suicidal ideation who has refused a safety contract. Locking doors and windows may increase anxiety and feelings of entrapment, potentially exacerbating the client's distress and hindering open communication. Additionally, it may not address underlying emotional and psychological factors contributing to the suicidal thoughts.

Choice B: Remove any objects from the client's environment that could be used for self-harm: Similar to Choice A, removing potential means can be a helpful safety measure but should not be the primary intervention in this situation. It is important to recognize that clients can find alternative means if they are determined to self-harm, and focusing solely on environmental control can detract from addressing the root of the suicidal crisis.

Choice C: Assign a staff member to stay with the client at times: This option prioritizes the client's safety and emotional well-being by providing constant support and supervision. A dedicated staff member can:

Monitor the client's behavior and emotional state closely, potentially identifying early warning signs of impending self-harm.

Provide open and non-judgmental support, allowing the client to express their thoughts and feelings freely without fear of being alone with their distress.

Engage in therapeutic communication, helping the client explore alternative coping mechanisms and develop safety plans for managing suicidal urges.

Alert other healthcare professionals if the client's condition deteriorates or if there is any immediate risk of self- harm.

Offer a sense of security and reassurance, knowing someone is constantly available to listen and intervene if needed.

Choice D: Provide the client with plastic eating utensils for meals: While this precaution may reduce the risk of self- harm at mealtimes, it addresses a very specific concern and does not address the broader issue of the client's suicidal ideation. It is also important to consider that plastic utensils may not be effective in preventing self-harm if the client is determined and resourceful.

Therefore, assigning a staff member to stay with the client at all times is the most appropriate and immediate action to prioritize the client's safety and emotional well-being in this situation. This approach fosters open communication, provides continuous support, and allows for early intervention if necessary. While environmental controls and risk assessments can be valuable complementary strategies, they should not overshadow the importance of close human connection and emotional support in crisis situations.