A nurse is instructing a nursing assistant on how to assist a patient with bathing.

The patient has hemiparesis on the left side due to a stroke.

Which of the following statements by the nursing assistant demonstrates understanding of the teaching?

Choice A rationale:

Including the family in the discharge teaching is essential, especially when dealing with a client who has communication barriers such as hearing loss and illiteracy. Involving the daughter in the teaching process ensures that she is aware of the client's care needs and can provide support at home.

Choice B rationale:

Encouraging the client to attend reading classes is not a practical intervention for an older adult with hearing loss. Reading classes may not address the immediate communication needs of the client, and the client's primary caregiver, in this case, is the daughter who will provide daily care and support.

Choice C rationale:

Facing the client when speaking is a crucial intervention when dealing with someone who has hearing loss. By facing the client, the nurse ensures that the client can see their lips and facial expressions, which can aid in lip-reading and understanding the communication better.

Choice D rationale:

Speaking loudly when teaching is not always the best approach for clients with hearing loss. While it may seem intuitive to speak loudly, it can distort speech and make it more challenging for the client to understand. Clear and slow speech, along with visual cues, is often more effective.

Choice E rationale:

Providing the daughter with written instructions is essential, especially when the client has limited reading skills. Written instructions can serve as a reference guide for the daughter, helping her provide care and support to her father accurately.

Choice A rationale:

The combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole has a synergistic effect, which means that the two drugs work together to inhibit bacterial growth more effectively than either drug alone. This combination is commonly used to treat urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by susceptible bacteria.

Choice B rationale:

The combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole does not have an additive effect that reduces the dosage and frequency of administration of each drug. Instead, it is prescribed as a fixed combination with specific dosages of each drug.

Choice C rationale:

The combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole does not have an antagonistic effect that prevents the development of resistance to either drug. In fact, the combination is chosen because it covers a broader spectrum of bacteria and reduces the likelihood of resistance development.

Choice D rationale:

The combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole does not have a selective effect that targets only the bacteria causing the UTI and spares the normal flora. It affects a wide range of bacteria, including both pathogenic and normal flora.