A patient with cholelithiasis has a gallstone lodged in the common bile duct and is unable to eat or drink without becoming nauseated and vomiting.

Which finding should the nurse report to the healthcare provider?

Choice A rationale:

Chronic pain is a significant concern for this client, but it is not the immediate priority. Pain can be managed with medications and comfort measures, while aspiration can be life-threatening.

Tissue destruction by the tumor is likely contributing to the pain, but addressing the risk of aspiration takes precedence.

Uncontrolled pain can exacerbate anxiety and make it difficult to focus on other interventions, but ensuring airway safety is paramount.

Choice B rationale:

Anxiety and grieving are expected reactions to a diagnosis of esophageal cancer, and they should be addressed as part of the client's care plan. However, they are not the immediate priority in this case.

The progression of the disease is a significant stressor, but attending to the risk of aspiration is essential for the client's safety. Psychological distress can negatively impact coping and quality of life, but addressing physical needs takes precedence.

Choice D rationale:

Imbalanced nutrition is a concern for this client due to dysphagia and anorexia. However, it is not the immediate priority. Nutritional interventions can be implemented once the risk of aspiration is addressed.

Difficulty swallowing can lead to inadequate intake and malnutrition, but ensuring airway safety is the primary concern.

Anorexia can further contribute to nutritional deficits, but preventing aspiration is the most pressing issue.

Choice C is the priority nursing problem because:

The client's dysphagia puts them at immediate risk for aspiration, which can lead to pneumonia, respiratory failure, and even death.

Addressing the risk of aspiration is essential to ensure the client's safety and prevent life-threatening complications. It's crucial to implement interventions to minimize the risk of aspiration, such as:

Elevating the head of the bed during meals and for 30-60 minutes after eating Thickening liquids and pureeing foods

Encouraging small, frequent meals

Monitoring for signs of aspiration, such as coughing, choking, or difficulty breathing

Rationale for Choice A:

Observing for edema around the ankles is a relevant assessment, but it's not the most crucial one in this context. Edema can be a sign of fluid retention, which is a potential side effect of hydromorphone. However, it's not the most immediate or dangerous concern associated with prolonged hydromorphone use.

Rationale for Choice B:

Counting the apical and radial pulses simultaneously is a technique used to assess for pulse deficits, which can indicate heart rhythm irregularities. While hydromorphone can potentially cause cardiac effects, it's not the most common or primary concern with its use. Other assessments take priority.

Rationale for Choice C:

Measuring the patient's capillary glucose level is important for patients with diabetes or those at risk for hyperglycemia. However, there's no direct link between hydromorphone use and blood glucose levels. This assessment isn't the most relevant in this specific scenario.

Rationale for Choice D:

Auscultating the patient's bowel sounds is the most important assessment for a patient who has been receiving hydromorphone for four days. Here's why:

Hydromorphone is a potent opioid analgesic that can significantly slow down gastrointestinal motility. This can lead to constipation, which, if severe, can progress to ileus (a complete lack of bowel movement).

Ileus is a serious complication that can cause abdominal pain, bloating, nausea, vomiting, and even bowel obstruction or perforation if left untreated.

Auscultating bowel sounds helps assess the patient's bowel activity and detect early signs of constipation or ileus. Normal bowel sounds are typically heard every 5-15 seconds. Decreased or absent bowel sounds can indicate decreased bowel activity.

Early identification of constipation or ileus allows for prompt intervention, such as increasing fluid and fiber intake, administering laxatives or stool softeners, and potentially discontinuing or adjusting the hydromorphone dosage. This can prevent the development of more serious complications.

Therefore, auscultating the patient's bowel sounds is the most important assessment for the nurse to complete in this case, as it directly addresses the most significant potential complication associated with prolonged hydromorphone use.