The nurse arrives at work and is told to report (float) to the intensive care unit (ICU) for the day because the ICU is understaffed and needs additional nurses to care for the clients. The nurse has never worked in the ICU. The nurse should take which best action?
Ask the nursing supervisor to review the hospital's floating policy.
Clarify with the team leader to make a safe ICU client assignment.
Refuse to float to the ICU based on a lack of unit orientation.
Submit a written protest to nursing administration, then call the hospital's lawyer.
The Correct Answer is B
Rationale:
A. While understanding the hospital’s policy is important, this step alone does not address immediate patient safety concerns or the nurse’s own competence in providing ICU-level care. Floating policies usually allow for temporary reassignment, but safe client assignments must still be individualized based on the nurse’s skills and experience.
B. This is the best action. Nurses are legally and ethically responsible for providing safe care within their scope of practice and competence. Since the nurse has never worked in the ICU, it is critical to communicate openly with the team leader or charge nurse to assign clients that match the nurse’s skills, such as lower-acuity patients or supportive tasks under supervision. This ensures client safety while maintaining professional responsibility.
C. Complete refusal may not be appropriate without first attempting to find a safe solution. Nurses are expected to be flexible, but they must also advocate for patient safety and their own competency. Automatic refusal could be seen as insubordination unless a compromise, such as a safe assignment or orientation, is not possible.
D. This action is extreme and unnecessary in this situation. Legal action is not warranted when immediate patient care issues can be resolved through communication and clarification with supervisors. Taking this step would delay patient care and escalate conflict unnecessarily.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Rationale:
A. The primary principle in any situation involving electricity is safety. The client has already reported feeling an electric shock, which indicates that the device is still potentially hazardous. The first step must be to eliminate the source of danger by unplugging the radio or ensuring it is no longer connected to electricity. This protects both the client and anyone else in the area from further injury. Safety always takes precedence over assessment or administrative tasks.
B. While taking an apical pulse is important after an electric shock to assess for arrhythmias or other cardiac effects, it is secondary to removing the hazard. Performing an assessment while the source of electricity is still present could put the nurse or client at additional risk. Once the radio is disconnected and the client is safe, the nurse should then immediately assess cardiac status, including pulse, heart rhythm, and vital signs.
C. Having the maintenance department check the device is necessary to prevent future hazards, but it is a later action, not the first priority. Immediate safety and assessment of the client’s condition take precedence over administrative follow-up.
D. Inspecting for burns or other injuries is essential, as electric shocks can cause external burns, internal tissue damage, or cardiac complications, but again, it is secondary. The nurse must first remove the source of electricity to prevent additional injury. After the device is disconnected, the nurse can safely evaluate for burns, neurological changes, or other complications.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Rationale:
A. This response is not the most appropriate because it is confrontational and may undermine the new nurse in front of the client. While rotating sites unnecessarily may cause discomfort, simply stating it would cause harm does not promote learning or critical thinking. It also fails to assess the new nurse’s current understanding of evidence-based practice.
B. This is the best response because it uses a supportive, educational approach consistent with professional nursing practice. By asking the new nurse what they understand about the evidence, the experienced nurse encourages critical thinking, assesses knowledge gaps, and creates an opportunity for teaching about current research. This aligns with principles of evidence-based practice and promotes a collaborative learning environment without embarrassing the new nurse.
C. This option is inappropriate because the issue is not about the technical skill of inserting an IV line, but rather about applying current evidence to practice. Teaching a skill does not address the misunderstanding regarding outdated practice.
D. While this statement is true, it is too vague and does not actively engage the new nurse in understanding or applying the evidence. It also misses the opportunity to assess the nurse’s knowledge and guide them toward correct clinical reasoning.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
