The nurse is to administer 10 mg/kg of acetaminophen to a patient who weighs 70 pounds (32 kg). The acetaminophen elixir is 160 mg per 5 mL. How many mL of medication will be given to the patient for each dose?

Choice A rationale:

Loosening the tape gently by pressing the skin away from it is an important step in changing a burn dressing. However, it is not the first intervention that should be performed. This is because removing the tape can be painful, and it is important to ensure that the patient is adequately pain-free before proceeding.

Choice B rationale:

Observing the wound bed for the presence of granulation tissue is also an important part of burn care. Granulation tissue is a sign of healing, and its presence indicates that the wound is progressing as expected. However, this assessment is not the first priority when changing a dressing. Pain management should always be addressed first.

Choice D rationale:

Gently irrigating the wound using sterile normal saline is another important step in burn care. Irrigation helps to cleanse the wound and remove any debris or dead tissue. However, it should not be performed until the patient's pain has been adequately controlled.

Choice C rationale:

Administering pain medication 30 minutes beforehand is the most important first intervention when changing a painful burn dressing. This allows time for the medication to take effect and ensure that the patient is comfortable before the dressing change begins. Pain management is crucial in burn care, as it can help to reduce anxiety, promote healing, and improve patient outcomes.

Choice A rationale:

While providing meticulous oral care and allowing ice chips for dry mouth can promote comfort, it does not address the primary concern of absent bowel sounds.

Ice chips could potentially stimulate bowel activity, but this is not a reliable or recommended method for managing absent bowel sounds in the immediate postoperative period.

It's essential to prioritize actions that assess and address the potential causes of absent bowel sounds, as they can indicate serious complications.

Choice B rationale:

Notifying the surgeon immediately and preparing for emergency surgery is not the appropriate first course of action in this situation.

Emergency surgery would be considered only if there were clear signs of a life-threatening complication, such as bowel perforation or peritonitis.

These complications would typically present with additional symptoms such as severe abdominal pain, fever, and hemodynamic instability.

Absent bowel sounds alone, without other concerning signs, do not warrant immediate surgical intervention.

Choice D rationale:

Allowing the patient to have clear liquids as tolerated is not appropriate when bowel sounds are absent. Introducing oral intake before bowel function has returned can increase the risk of nausea, vomiting, and aspiration.

It's crucial to wait for the return of bowel sounds before initiating oral intake to ensure proper digestion and minimize complications.

Choice C rationale:

Keeping the patient NPO (nothing by mouth) is the most appropriate action when bowel sounds are absent after major abdominal surgery.

This allows the bowel to rest and recover from the surgical manipulation.

It also prevents potential complications such as aspiration and nausea/vomiting that could arise from premature oral intake.

Documenting the absence of bowel sounds in the patient's medical record is essential for communication among healthcare providers and for monitoring the patient's progress.

This documentation provides a clear record of the patient's clinical status and facilitates appropriate decision-making regarding further interventions.