The nurse is to administer 10 mg/kg of acetaminophen to a patient who weighs 70 pounds (32 kg). The acetaminophen elixir is 160 mg per 5 mL. How many mL of medication will be given to the patient for each dose?

Rationale for Choice A:

Mixing insulin detemir and insulin aspart in the same syringe is not recommended due to their differing physicochemical properties and potential for altered absorption and action profiles.

It's crucial to follow manufacturer guidelines, as mixing may lead to suboptimal glycemic control or unpredictable insulin activity.

Rationale for Choice B:

The order of mixing insulin detemir and insulin aspart, even if done incorrectly in the same syringe, would not significantly impact the overall contraindication of mixing them.

The primary concern remains the potential for altered pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics when these insulins are combined.

Rationale for Choice C:

Drawing up insulin aspart and insulin detemir in separate syringes is the correct procedure.

This approach ensures that each insulin maintains its intended action profile and absorption characteristics, leading to more predictable glycemic control.

It also aligns with best practices and guidelines for insulin administration.

Rationale for Choice D:

While drawing up insulin detemir first in a separate syringe is technically correct, it offers no specific advantage over drawing up insulin aspart first in a separate syringe.

The key principle is to avoid mixing the two insulins in the same syringe.

Choice A rationale:

Directly addresses the primary goal of preventing perioperative positioning injury: The absence of redness or breakdown in the skin is the most definitive indicator that the patient has not sustained any skin or tissue damage as a result of prolonged immobilization during surgery.

Focuses on the patient outcome, not just interventions: While interventions such as padding bony prominences and assessing skin prior to surgery are important, they are means to achieve the ultimate goal of preventing skin injury. This outcome statement directly measures the success of those interventions.

Aligns with best practices for pressure injury prevention: The National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) and other expert organizations emphasize the importance of setting goals that focus on maintaining skin integrity and preventing injury.

Choice B rationale:

Addresses a crucial aspect of patient care, but not directly related to positioning injury: Maintaining privacy and dignity is essential for all patients, but it does not specifically address the risk of skin breakdown from prolonged immobilization.

Not a measurable outcome for positioning injury: It is difficult to objectively assess whether a patient's privacy and dignity have been maintained, making it less suitable as an outcome statement for this particular diagnosis.

Choice C rationale:

Describes an important intervention, but not a patient outcome: Padding bony prominences is a key strategy to reduce pressure and prevent skin injury. However, it is an action taken by the nurse, not a measurable outcome that reflects the patient's status.

Does not guarantee prevention of injury: Even with appropriate padding, patients can still develop pressure injuries if other risk factors are present or if repositioning is not performed adequately.

Choice D rationale:

Represents an essential assessment step, but not a final outcome: Assessing the skin prior to surgery is important for identifying areas that are at increased risk of breakdown. However, it is a preliminary step in the prevention process, not the ultimate goal.

Does not ensure prevention of injury: Identifying at-risk areas is helpful for targeting interventions, but it does not guarantee that skin breakdown will not occur.