When inspecting the client's skin, the nurse observes several areas of ecchymosis on the trunk and extremities. Which information in the client's history requires additional follow-up by the nurse?

Choice A Reason:
Reviewing the client's serum electrolytes is incorrect. While abnormalities in electrolyte levels can sometimes contribute to neurological symptoms, such as paresthesia, reviewing the client's serum electrolytes may not directly identify additional findings consistent with the client's reported paresthesia of the hands and legs. Therefore, this option is less relevant for assessing paresthesia and identifying additional consistent findings.
Choice B Reason:
This is the correct action to identify additional findings consistent with the client's paresthesia. Paresthesia, or abnormal sensations like burning or tingling, may indicate neurological dysfunction. Assessing the client's muscle strength and hand grips can provide valuable information about neurological function and help identify any weakness or changes that may be associated with the paresthesia.
Choice C Reason:
Checking distal phalanges capillary refill is incorrect. Checking distal phalanges capillary refill is important for assessing peripheral circulation, but it may not directly identify additional findings consistent with paresthesia. While impaired circulation could contribute to sensory disturbances, such as paresthesia, it is not always the primary cause. Therefore, this option may not fully capture the sensory aspect of the client's reported symptoms.
Choice D Reason:
While observing the skin for signs of inflammation or irritation is important in assessing for other conditions, such as infection or inflammation, it is not directly related to identifying additional findings consistent with paresthesia. Paresthesia primarily involves abnormal sensations and neurological function rather than changes in the skin.

Choice A Reason:
Performing passive range of motion and compare the findings is inappropriate. While assessing passive range of motion can provide information about joint mobility and flexibility, it may not directly address the asymmetry observed in the legs. Range of motion assessment is more relevant for evaluating joint function and flexibility rather than leg length asymmetry.
Choice B Reason:
Comparing measured circumferences of each extremity joint is inappropriate. Measuring circumferences of extremity joints may help identify differences in muscle mass or swelling, but it may not directly address the asymmetrical leg length observed. Circumference measurements are more relevant for assessing muscle bulk or detecting signs of edema rather than leg length asymmetry.
Choice C Reason:
Instructing client to walk across the room and observe the gait is inappropriate. Observing the client's gait can provide valuable information about their walking pattern and any abnormalities in movement. While an abnormal gait may be associated with leg length asymmetry, directly measuring leg length would provide more precise data for evaluation.
Choice D Reason:
Measuring the length of each leg and document the findings is appropriate. Measuring the length of each leg can help identify any significant differences in leg length, which could be contributing to the asymmetry observed. Leg length discrepancy can result from various musculoskeletal conditions such as scoliosis, hip dysplasia, or unequal growth rates. Documenting the findings allows for accurate tracking of changes over time and provides important information for healthcare providers to determine appropriate interventions, such as orthotic devices or physical therapy.