Which nursing intervention is most effective in determining the severity of a client’s pain?
Compare the client’s current vital signs to the admission baseline.
Review the client’s medical history and admission assessment.
Note how frequently doses of analgesics have been administered.
Ask the client to describe the intensity of the pain being experienced.
The Correct Answer is D
Choice A reason: Comparing vital signs to baseline may show tachycardia from pain-induced sympathetic activation, but this is non-specific, as fever or anxiety can mimic these. Pain is subjective, involving nociceptor signaling, and the client’s direct intensity description provides the most accurate severity measure, guiding targeted treatment.
Choice B reason: Reviewing medical history provides pain context but not current severity. Pain perception involves spinal and cortical nociceptive pathways, and only the client’s description quantifies intensity. Historical data informs diagnosis, but direct assessment is more precise for evaluating present pain, ensuring appropriate analgesic intervention.
Choice C reason: Noting analgesic frequency suggests pain control needs but not current severity. Frequent dosing may indicate tolerance or inadequate relief, not intensity. Pain’s subjective nature, mediated by neural pathways, requires the client’s report to assess severity accurately, guiding dosing over indirect medication usage patterns.
Choice D reason: Asking the client to describe pain intensity directly captures their subjective experience, mediated by nociceptors and cortical perception. Using a 0–10 scale quantifies severity, guiding precise analgesia. This is most effective, as pain is personal, ensuring accurate assessment and tailored treatment to alleviate discomfort effectively.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A reason: Evaluating urinary output hourly monitors renal function post-ureterolithotomy, as obstruction or complications may reduce output. However, urine leakage around the catheter suggests dislodgement or ureteral injury, risking peritonitis or infection. Reporting leakage is more urgent, as it indicates a critical catheter malfunction requiring immediate medical attention.
Choice B reason: Clamping the ureteral catheter risks obstructing urine flow, increasing pressure and causing ureteral damage or reflux, potentially leading to hydronephrosis or infection. Leakage around the catheter is a more pressing issue, indicating possible perforation or displacement, necessitating urgent reporting to prevent severe complications.
Choice C reason: Securing the catheter prevents dislodgement but is routine. Urine leakage suggests a critical issue like catheter malfunction or ureteral injury, which could cause peritonitis or fistula. Reporting leakage takes precedence, as it addresses a potentially life-threatening complication, ensuring timely intervention over standard catheter care.
Choice D reason: Reporting urine leakage is critical, as it may indicate catheter displacement or ureteral perforation, risking peritonitis or infection. Leakage suggests the catheter fails to drain urine properly, a serious post-surgical issue requiring immediate assessment, potentially via imaging or surgical correction, to prevent renal or systemic complications.
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A reason: Discontinuing the nasal cannula is inappropriate, as 94% SpO₂ indicates mild hypoxemia from pneumonia, requiring oxygen to support alveolar diffusion. The rash likely results from cannula pressure, not oxygen delivery. Padding addresses the rash without compromising respiratory support, ensuring continued therapy.
Choice B reason: Decreasing to 1 L/minute may worsen hypoxemia in pneumonia, where inflamed alveoli impair gas exchange (SpO₂ 94%). The rash is from mechanical irritation, not flow rate. Padding relieves pressure, maintaining oxygen delivery to improve saturation, making flow reduction counterproductive to respiratory needs.
Choice C reason: Applying lubricant reduces friction but not pressure causing the red macular rash from prolonged cannula contact. Lubricants risk aspiration. Padding alleviates pressure points, preventing skin breakdown while maintaining oxygen for pneumonia, addressing the rash’s mechanical cause more effectively than lubrication.
Choice D reason: Placing padding around the cannula tubing relieves pressure on the cheek, preventing skin breakdown from the red macular rash. This maintains oxygen at 3 L/minute, critical for pneumonia’s hypoxemia, where inflamed alveoli reduce oxygen diffusion. Padding ensures skin integrity and respiratory support, addressing both issues effectively.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.