While auscultating a client's abdomen, the nurse hears a low-pitched blowing sound in the upper midline area. Which is the likely indication of this finding?
Hyperactive bowel sounds.
A minor variation.
Possible renal artery stenosis.
Normal borborygmus sounds.
The Correct Answer is C
A) Hyperactive bowel sounds:
Hyperactive bowel sounds are typically characterized by loud, high-pitched gurgles heard throughout the abdomen. They are often associated with increased intestinal motility, such as in gastroenteritis or diarrhea, rather than a low-pitched blowing sound in the upper midline area.
B) A minor variation:
A minor variation may refer to a benign finding or a slight deviation from the norm. However, a low-pitched blowing sound in the upper midline area would not typically be considered a minor variation and may warrant further investigation.
C) Possible renal artery stenosis:
A low-pitched blowing sound in the upper midline area could indicate a renal artery bruit, which is a sign of renal artery stenosis. Renal artery stenosis is a narrowing of the renal artery, often due to atherosclerosis, which can lead to decreased blood flow to the kidneys. A renal artery bruit may be auscultated over the renal arteries and is indicative of turbulent blood flow through the narrowed artery.
D) Normal borborygmus sounds:
Borborygmi are normal bowel sounds characterized by gurgling, rumbling, or growling noises produced by the movement of gas and fluid in the intestines. However, a low-pitched blowing sound in the upper midline area would not typically be described as normal borborygmi. Borborygmi are usually heard at a higher frequency and throughout the abdomen.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Answer: C. Assure the client that her breasts are normal, and advise annual evaluations.
Rationale:
A. Suggest that the client schedule a mammogram after her next menstrual period:
A mammogram is generally not indicated for adolescents unless there are specific concerns such as a family history of breast cancer or the presence of abnormal findings. Given the client's age and the findings of generalized lumpiness without discrete masses, a mammogram would not be the most appropriate action at this stage.
B. Explain to the client that an ultrasound of the breast will likely be necessary:
An ultrasound is typically used for further evaluation if discrete masses are found or if there are unusual characteristics in the breast tissue. In this case, the generalized lumpiness is likely related to normal physiological changes, making an ultrasound unnecessary at this time.
C. Assure the client that her breasts are normal, and advise annual evaluations:
The findings of generalized lumpiness and tenderness before menstruation are consistent with normal physiological changes associated with the menstrual cycle, often due to hormonal fluctuations. Providing reassurance and advising annual evaluations is appropriate, as it addresses the client's concerns and promotes confidence in her breast health without unnecessary interventions.
D. Request a return visit after her menstrual period for a breast exam re-check:
While a follow-up can be beneficial, it may not be necessary in this case since the findings are typical of normal breast tissue changes associated with the menstrual cycle. Reassuring the client and encouraging annual evaluations is a more effective approach than suggesting an unnecessary follow-up visit.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
A) Continue with the remainder of the client's physical assessment:
Vesicular breath sounds are normal breath sounds heard over the peripheral lung fields. Hearing vesicular sounds in the bases of both lungs posteriorly indicates normal air movement in the lungs. Therefore, there is no immediate concern or need for further action related to this finding. The nurse should continue with the remainder of the client's physical assessment.
B) Report the client's abnormal lung sounds to the healthcare provider:
Vesicular breath sounds are considered normal lung sounds and do not warrant reporting as abnormal. Reporting this finding to the healthcare provider would not be appropriate and may lead to unnecessary concern or intervention.
C) Ask the client to cough and then auscultate at the site again:
Coughing would not be necessary in response to hearing vesicular breath sounds, as these are normal lung sounds. Repeating the auscultation may not provide additional information beyond confirming the presence of normal breath sounds.
D) Measure the client's oxygen saturation with a pulse oximeter:
Measuring oxygen saturation with a pulse oximeter is not indicated in response to hearing vesicular breath sounds. These breath sounds are normal and do not necessarily indicate a problem with oxygenation. Therefore, measuring oxygen saturation would not be the appropriate action in this situation.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.