While auscultating a client's breath sounds, the nurse hears vesicular sounds in the bases of both lungs posteriorly. Which action should the nurse take in response to this finding?
Continue with the remainder of the client's physical assessment.
Report the client's abnormal lung sounds to the healthcare provider.
Ask the client to cough and then auscultate at the site again.
Measure the client's oxygen saturation with a pulse oximeter.
The Correct Answer is A
A) Continue with the remainder of the client's physical assessment:
Vesicular breath sounds are normal breath sounds heard over the peripheral lung fields. Hearing vesicular sounds in the bases of both lungs posteriorly indicates normal air movement in the lungs. Therefore, there is no immediate concern or need for further action related to this finding. The nurse should continue with the remainder of the client's physical assessment.
B) Report the client's abnormal lung sounds to the healthcare provider:
Vesicular breath sounds are considered normal lung sounds and do not warrant reporting as abnormal. Reporting this finding to the healthcare provider would not be appropriate and may lead to unnecessary concern or intervention.
C) Ask the client to cough and then auscultate at the site again:
Coughing would not be necessary in response to hearing vesicular breath sounds, as these are normal lung sounds. Repeating the auscultation may not provide additional information beyond confirming the presence of normal breath sounds.
D) Measure the client's oxygen saturation with a pulse oximeter:
Measuring oxygen saturation with a pulse oximeter is not indicated in response to hearing vesicular breath sounds. These breath sounds are normal and do not necessarily indicate a problem with oxygenation. Therefore, measuring oxygen saturation would not be the appropriate action in this situation.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
A) Use a doppler to assess an audible DP pulse:
Using a doppler to assess an audible DP pulse may provide additional information about the presence or absence of the pulse, but it does not address the underlying cause of the absent pulse. It is important to first investigate potential causes, such as vascular disease, before resorting to additional assessment techniques.
B) Place a mark where DP pulse is auscultated:
Marking the location where the DP pulse is auscultated may assist with future assessments but does not address the underlying reason for the absent pulse. It is essential to determine the cause of the absent pulse before considering further interventions.
C) Review client's history for vascular disease:
Reviewing the client's history for vascular disease is the most important intervention in this scenario. Absence of a DP pulse may indicate peripheral vascular disease or other circulatory issues. Reviewing the client's history for risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, smoking, or previous vascular problems can provide valuable information to guide further assessment and management.
D) Assess capillary refill distal to the DP pulse:
Assessing capillary refill distal to the DP pulse is important for evaluating peripheral perfusion but may not directly address the underlying cause of the absent pulse. While assessing capillary refill is a valuable assessment, reviewing the client's history for vascular disease takes precedence in determining the cause of the absent DP pulse.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
A) Continue with the remainder of the client's physical assessment:
Vesicular breath sounds are normal breath sounds heard over the peripheral lung fields. Hearing vesicular sounds in the bases of both lungs posteriorly indicates normal air movement in the lungs. Therefore, there is no immediate concern or need for further action related to this finding. The nurse should continue with the remainder of the client's physical assessment.
B) Report the client's abnormal lung sounds to the healthcare provider:
Vesicular breath sounds are considered normal lung sounds and do not warrant reporting as abnormal. Reporting this finding to the healthcare provider would not be appropriate and may lead to unnecessary concern or intervention.
C) Ask the client to cough and then auscultate at the site again:
Coughing would not be necessary in response to hearing vesicular breath sounds, as these are normal lung sounds. Repeating the auscultation may not provide additional information beyond confirming the presence of normal breath sounds.
D) Measure the client's oxygen saturation with a pulse oximeter:
Measuring oxygen saturation with a pulse oximeter is not indicated in response to hearing vesicular breath sounds. These breath sounds are normal and do not necessarily indicate a problem with oxygenation. Therefore, measuring oxygen saturation would not be the appropriate action in this situation.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.