A client is admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) after ingesting a large amount of diazepam. Which medication would the nurse expect the ED physician to order?

Choice A Reason:

“You should share this thought with your psychiatrist.”

This response suggests that the client should discuss their harmful thoughts with their psychiatrist. While it is important for the client to communicate openly with their mental health provider, this response does not directly address the nurse’s ethical and legal obligation to report threats of harm. The nurse has a duty to ensure the safety of others, and simply redirecting the client to another professional does not fulfill this responsibility. According to the Tarasoff rule, healthcare providers have a duty to warn potential victims if a client poses a credible threat.

Choice B Reason:

“I can make that promise to you based on nurse-client privilege.”

This statement is incorrect because nurse-client privilege does not extend to situations where there is a threat of harm to others. Confidentiality in healthcare is crucial, but it has limits, especially when it comes to preventing harm. Nurses are legally and ethically obligated to report any threats of violence or harm to appropriate authorities to protect potential victims. Making such a promise would be misleading and could result in serious consequences.

Choice C Reason:

“Those kinds of thoughts will make your hospitalization longer.”

This response is inappropriate as it focuses on the potential consequences for the client rather than addressing the immediate concern of a threat to another person’s safety. It may also discourage the client from being honest about their thoughts in the future. The primary responsibility of the nurse in this situation is to ensure the safety of the client and others, which involves reporting the threat to the appropriate authorities.

Choice D Reason:

“I cannot promise that. Confidentiality does not include plans to hurt others.”

This is the correct response. It clearly communicates to the client that while confidentiality is important, it does not cover plans to harm others. The nurse must explain that they are obligated to report any threats of violence to ensure the safety of potential victims. This response aligns with legal and ethical guidelines, which mandate that healthcare providers report credible threats of harm.

Choice A Reason:

The statement “Autonomy” is correct. Autonomy is the ethical principle that respects an individual’s right to make their own decisions and act on their own values. By allowing clients to choose whether or not to attend group therapy, the unit manager is preserving the clients’ autonomy. This approach acknowledges the clients’ ability to make informed decisions about their own treatment and respects their personal preferences and values1. Autonomy is a fundamental principle in healthcare, emphasizing the importance of respecting patients’ rights to self-determination.

Choice B Reason:

The statement “Justice” is incorrect. Justice refers to the ethical principle of treating individuals fairly and equitably. While justice is an important consideration in healthcare, the policy of allowing clients to choose whether or not to attend group therapy is more directly related to respecting their autonomy rather than ensuring equitable treatment. Justice would be more relevant in ensuring that all clients have equal access to group therapy sessions and resources.

Choice C Reason:

The statement “Beneficence” is incorrect. Beneficence is the ethical principle that involves acting in the best interest of the client and promoting their well-being. While encouraging group therapy can be seen as an act of beneficence, the specific policy of allowing clients to choose whether or not to attend is more aligned with respecting their autonomy. Beneficence focuses on doing good for the client, whereas autonomy emphasizes the client’s right to make their own choices.

Choice D Reason:

The statement “Veracity” is incorrect. Veracity refers to the ethical principle of truthfulness and honesty in interactions with clients. While veracity is crucial in maintaining trust and transparency in the therapeutic relationship, the policy of allowing clients to choose whether or not to attend group therapy is primarily about respecting their autonomy. Veracity would be more relevant in ensuring that clients are fully informed about the benefits and potential risks of group therapy.