A laboring client is at 10 cm dilation.
What would the nurse do next?

Choice A rationale

This response is dismissive and does not address the patient's concerns. Providing accurate information empowers the patient to make informed decisions about their health. The nurse should always address patient concerns and provide education, especially when it relates to their birth experience and future reproductive health. Failing to do so can erode trust and negatively impact the patient-provider relationship.

Choice B rationale

This statement is an oversimplification and potentially inaccurate. The feasibility of a vaginal birth after a cesarean section (VBAC) depends on several factors, including the type of uterine incision. A classical vertical incision, for instance, is a strong contraindication due to a significantly increased risk of uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies. The nurse must provide a more nuanced and accurate explanation.

Choice C rationale

This is an incorrect and potentially harmful statement. A previous cesarean section does not automatically preclude a future vaginal delivery. A vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) is a viable option for many individuals, particularly those who had a low transverse uterine incision. The decision is based on a careful assessment of risks and benefits with the patient's provider.

Choice D rationale

This statement is the most accurate and scientifically grounded response. The type of uterine incision is the most significant factor determining the safety of a future vaginal delivery. A low transverse incision has a lower risk of rupture during a trial of labor, making VBAC a safe option for many. A classical (vertical) incision, conversely, carries a high risk of uterine rupture, necessitating a repeat cesarean.

Choice A rationale

Racemic epinephrine nebulizer therapy is a highly effective measure for bronchodilation in a child with croup. This alpha-adrenergic agonist works by stimulating receptors in the smooth muscle of the airway. This stimulation leads to vasoconstriction, reducing the mucosal edema and swelling of the vocal cords and trachea that are characteristic of croup. The rapid reduction in upper airway inflammation and swelling directly alleviates stridor and respiratory distress, improving airflow and oxygenation.

Choice B rationale

Teaching a child to take long, slow breaths is generally a technique used for anxiety or to prevent hyperventilation. However, in a child with croup, the upper airway obstruction makes deep breathing difficult and may increase their distress. The effort to take long, slow breaths against a narrowed airway can further exacerbate the child's respiratory effort and may not provide any significant relief from the underlying swelling.

Choice C rationale

Administering an oral analgesic would be ineffective for aiding bronchodilation in a child with croup. The primary issue in croup is upper airway inflammation and edema, not pain. Analgesics, such as acetaminophen or ibuprofen, primarily work to reduce fever and discomfort. They have no direct pharmacological effect on the smooth muscles of the bronchi or on the mucosal swelling that is causing the respiratory distress.

Choice D rationale

Urging a child to continue to take oral fluids is important for hydration, but it does not directly aid in bronchodilation. In a child with significant respiratory distress from croup, encouraging oral fluids may actually pose a risk for aspiration due to their difficulty breathing and potential fatigue. While hydration is a supportive measure, it does not address the underlying pathology of airway swelling and is not a primary intervention for bronchodilation.