A nurse asks a newly hired assistive personnel (AP) to remove a client's indwelling urinary catheter. Which of the following actions should the nurse take to ensure the AP is qualified to perform this task?

The correct answer is choice B: "This is a procedure that does not require written informed consent."

Choice B rationale: Informed consent is typically required for invasive procedures, surgery, or treatments that carry significant risks. While inserting an indwelling urinary catheter is considered an invasive procedure, it is generally not a procedure that requires written informed consent. Nurses often have standing orders or standardized procedures in place for catheterization, and consent is usually implied or obtained verbally.

Choice A rationale: Although providers prescribe procedures, consent is still necessary in many cases. However, as mentioned above, written informed consent is not typically required for urinary catheter insertion due to its routine nature in medical care.

Choice C rationale: Discussing the issue with the charge nurse is unnecessary since written informed consent is not generally required for this procedure. The nurse should instead focus on educating the family about standard hospital practices.

Choice D rationale: Asking the family to sign the informed consent form at this point is not appropriate, as it implies that the procedure should not have been performed without written consent. Additionally, urinary catheterization does not typically require written informed consent, so asking them to sign a form could create confusion or unnecessary concern.

The correct answer is Choice D: Review the client's request with the family.

Choice D rationale: Reviewing the client's request with the family respects the client's autonomy and the directives stated in their living will. It allows the nurse to communicate and clarify the client's wishes with the family, helping them understand the decisions made by the client when they were competent. This action promotes open communication and may facilitate resolution of the conflict.

Choice A rationale: Inserting the tube and beginning feedings per the family's request disregards the client's living will, which explicitly declines the use of artificial enteral nutrition as a life-sustaining measure. This action goes against the ethical principle of autonomy and could have legal implications.

Choice B rationale: While asking the provider to discuss the issue with the family could be a subsequent step, it is not the primary action to take in this situation. The nurse should first review the client's request with the family to emphasize the importance of the living will and facilitate understanding between the parties involved.

Choice C rationale: Reporting the dilemma to the facility's dietitian does not address the ethical and legal concerns at hand. The dietitian's role is to manage nutritional needs, not to resolve ethical dilemmas or interpret legal documents such as living wills. Involving the dietitian may not be helpful in addressing the conflict between the client's wishes and the family's request.