A nurse in a hospital is caring for a client who has agoraphobia.
Which of the following statements by the client indicates understanding of the goals of treatment?

Choice A rationale:

Seclusion may be considered for a school-age client who repeatedly bites staff as a method of last resort to ensure the safety of both the client and staff.

It's important to exhaust other interventions first, such as verbal de-escalation, redirection, and medication.

If seclusion is used, it should be implemented under strict guidelines, with close monitoring and frequent reassessment to determine its effectiveness and necessity.

Choice B rationale:

Seclusion may be considered for an older adult client who is manic and agitated due to overstimulation, as it can provide a safe and quiet environment to reduce sensory input and promote calming.

However, it's crucial to carefully assess the client's physical and cognitive status, as seclusion can exacerbate confusion and disorientation in older adults.

Close monitoring and reassessment are essential.

Choice C rationale:

Seclusion may be considered for an adolescent client who throws objects at other clients to maintain safety and prevent harm to others.

It's important to first attempt other interventions, such as verbal de-escalation, redirection, and limit-setting.

If seclusion is used, it should be brief and implemented with therapeutic goals in mind, such as promoting self-regulation and problem-solving skills.

Choice D rationale:

Seclusion is contraindicated for an adult client after an interrupted suicide attempt.

This is because seclusion can increase isolation, hopelessness, and despair, which are significant risk factors for suicide.

It can also hinder close observation and monitoring of the client's mental state, potentially leading to further suicide attempts.

Instead, the focus should be on providing supportive, one-to-one contact, ensuring safety, and establishing therapeutic rapport to address the underlying issues that led to the suicide attempt.

Choice A rationale: The client’s magnesium level is 1.7 mg/dL, which is below the normal range of 1.8 to 2.4 mg/dL. Hypomagnesemia can cause neuromuscular irritability, muscle weakness, tremors, and even seizures or cardiac arrhythmias in severe cases.

It’s often associated with other electrolyte imbalances such as hypokalemia and hypocalcemia.

In the context of anorexia nervosa, this could be due to inadequate dietary intake, malabsorption, or excessive losses from the gastrointestinal tract.

Choice B rationale: The client’s chloride level is 98 mmol/L, which falls within the normal range of 96 to 106 mmol/L. Chloride is an important electrolyte that helps maintain acid-base balance, fluid balance, and is a component of gastric juice as hydrochloric acid.

There’s no immediate concern regarding the client’s chloride level.

Choice C rationale: The client’s phosphate level is 2.5 mg/dL, which is below the normal range of 2.8 to 4.5 mg/dL. Hypophosphatemia can lead to muscle weakness, bone pain, mental changes, and potentially life-threatening complications such as respiratory failure and heart failure.

In the context of anorexia nervosa, hypophosphatemia is a common complication during refeeding due to shifts in electrolytes.

Choice D rationale: The client’s potassium level is 3.5 mmol/L, which is at the lower end of the normal range of 3.5 to

5.0 mmol/L. Hypokalemia can cause muscle weakness, cramps, arrhythmias, and in severe cases, it can be life- threatening.

In the context of anorexia nervosa, this could be due to inadequate dietary intake, excessive losses due to vomiting or laxative abuse, or shifts in electrolytes during refeeding.

In conclusion, the nurse should follow up on the client’s magnesium, phosphate, and potassium levels due to their potential implications on the client’s health, especially considering the client’s current health status and the process of refeeding.