A nurse is caring for a client who is postpartum. Which of the following findings is an indication for the nurse to administer Rho(D) immune globulin?
The client is Rh positive and the newborn is Rh negative.
The client is Rh negative and the newborn is Rh positive.
The client is Rh negative and the newborn is Rh negative.
The client is Rh positive and the newborn is Rh positive.
The Correct Answer is B
Choice A rationale:
If the client is Rh positive and the newborn is Rh negative, there is no indication for administering Rho(D) immune globulin. Rho(D) immune globulin is only given when the Rh-negative mother gives birth to an Rh-positive baby.
Choice B rationale:
This is the correct choice for administering Rho(D) immune globulin. When the mother is Rh negative and the newborn is Rh positive, there is a risk of Rh incompatibility. If the fetal blood enters the mother's circulation during delivery, her immune system may produce antibodies against Rh-positive blood cells, which can be harmful to future Rh-positive pregnancies. To prevent this, Rho(D) immune globulin is administered to the Rh-negative mother shortly after delivery.
Choice C rationale:
If both the mother and the newborn are Rh-negative, there is no risk of Rh incompatibility. Rho(D) immune globulin is not required in this situation.
Choice D rationale:
If both the mother and the newborn are Rh-positive, there is no risk of Rh incompatibility. Rho(D) immune globulin is not indicated in this case.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A rationale:
0.25 mL - The nurse should not administer 0.25 mL because the available concentration of vitamin K injection is 1 mg/0.5 mL. To achieve the prescribed dose of 1 mg, administering only 0.25 mL would be insufficient.
Choice B rationale:
0.5 mL - This is the correct choice. The nurse should administer 0.5 mL of the vitamin K injection to deliver 1 mg of vitamin K, as the concentration of the injection is 1 mg/0.5 mL. By giving the full 0.5 mL, the newborn will receive the appropriate 1 mg dose.
Choice C rationale:
0.75 mL - Administering 0.75 mL would be excessive for the prescribed 1 mg dose of vitamin K. It is unnecessary to give a higher volume than required, as it could lead to potential adverse effects or wastage.
Choice D rationale:
1 mL - Similarly, administering the entire 1 mL of the vitamin K injection would result in doubling the prescribed dose, leading to potential overdose and adverse reactions. The nurse should avoid administering more than the necessary 0.5 mL.
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
The cervix is dilated 3 cm: This indicates the width of the cervical opening, which is 3 cm wide.
It is effaced 30%: This means the cervix has effaced or thinned out by 30%, indicating how much the cervix has shortened and thinned in preparation for labor.
The presenting part is 1 cm above the ischial spines (indicated by the negative number, -1): This measurement shows the position of the baby's head in relation to the ischial spines of the pelvis. In this case, the baby's head is 1 cm above the ischial spines.
Option A ("The cervix is dilated 3 cm, it is effaced 30%, and the presenting part is 1 cm below the ischial spines."): This option incorrectly interprets the baby's position as being 1 cm below the ischial spines, which is not the case. The negative sign (-1) in the documentation indicates that the presenting part is 1 cm above the ischial spines.
Option B ("The cervix is effaced 3 cm, it is dilated 30%, and the presenting part is 1 cm above the ischial spines."): This option switches the interpretation of dilation and effacement. In the original documentation, the dilation is given as 3 cm, while effacement is 30%. This option incorrectly states that effacement is 3 cm and dilation is 30%. Additionally, it correctly identifies the presenting part's position.
Option C ("The cervix is effaced 3 cm, it is dilated 30%, and the presenting part is 1 cm below the ischial spines."): This option correctly interprets effacement and dilation but incorrectly states that the presenting part is 1 cm below the ischial spines. The original documentation indicates that the presenting part is 1 cm above the ischial spines, as denoted by the negative sign (-1).
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.