A nurse is providing teaching to a client who is experiencing preterm contractions and dehydration. Which of the following statements should the nurse make?

Choice A reason: Guiding the client by walking parallel is less effective than offering an arm for support, which provides stability and orientation. Parallel walking does not ensure safe navigation for someone with visual impairment, as it lacks physical guidance, making it less appropriate for preventing falls or ensuring safety.
Choice B reason: Using a loud tone of voice assumes hearing impairment, which is not indicated in visual sensory loss. Normal volume with clear enunciation is sufficient, and loud tones may be perceived as disrespectful or startling. This intervention is unnecessary and inappropriate for addressing visual impairment, focusing on an irrelevant sensory issue.
Choice C reason: Rearranging bedside table items frequently disorients a visually impaired client, increasing confusion and fall risk. Consistent placement of items supports independence and safety by allowing the client to rely on memory and touch, making this intervention counterproductive and unsafe for the care plan.
Choice D reason: Removing objects from the path to the bathroom prevents tripping hazards, enhancing safety for a client with reduced visual perception. This intervention reduces fall risk, promotes independent mobility, and aligns with evidence-based practices for visually impaired individuals, making it the most effective and appropriate action.

Choice A reason: Advising over-the-counter medications as safe is incorrect, as many, like NSAIDs, increase warfarin’s bleeding risk by inhibiting platelets or affecting liver metabolism. Warfarin’s narrow therapeutic index requires careful management to prevent hemorrhage, making broad safety claims dangerous without specific evaluation.
Choice B reason: Consulting the pharmacist identifies interactions with warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist metabolized by CYP450 enzymes. Many drugs alter warfarin’s efficacy, risking thrombosis or bleeding. Pharmacist expertise ensures safe polypharmacy, maintaining therapeutic INR levels critical for managing pulmonary emboli effectively.
Choice C reason: Recommending warfarin with other medications ignores interaction risks and timing needs. Warfarin’s absorption is unaffected by timing, but CYP450 interactions can alter INR. This advice is irrelevant to safety, missing the need for individualized regimen assessment to prevent complications in anticoagulation therapy.
Choice D reason: Cranberry juice may enhance warfarin’s effect by inhibiting CYP2C9, increasing INR and bleeding risk. Advising its use without monitoring is unsafe, as dietary factors can destabilize anticoagulation, potentially causing hemorrhage in clients with pulmonary emboli, requiring careful dietary guidance.