After a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD), the client was started on epoetin. Which finding indicates that the medication has been effective?
Increase in serum hematocrit.
Increase in serum calcium.
Decrease in serum creatinine levels.
Decrease in blood pressure.
The Correct Answer is A
Choice A reason: An increase in serum hematocrit indicates that epoetin has been effective. Epoetin, also known as erythropoietin, is a medication used to stimulate the production of red blood cells. In patients with chronic kidney disease, the kidneys may not produce enough natural erythropoietin, leading to anemia. By administering epoetin, the goal is to increase red blood cell production, which is reflected in higher hematocrit levels (the proportion of red blood cells in the blood).
Choice B reason: An increase in serum calcium is not related to the effectiveness of epoetin. Serum calcium levels are regulated by different mechanisms, including parathyroid hormone and vitamin D, and are not directly influenced by epoetin administration.
Choice C reason: A decrease in serum creatinine levels would indicate improved kidney function, but this is not the expected outcome of epoetin therapy. Epoetin specifically targets red blood cell production and does not have a direct impact on kidney function or creatinine levels.
Choice D reason: A decrease in blood pressure is also not an expected indicator of epoetin effectiveness. While managing blood pressure is important in chronic kidney disease, epoetin's primary role is to address anemia by stimulating red blood cell production. Blood pressure regulation involves other medications and interventions.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A reason: Administering 2 tablets of digoxin 0.125 mg would provide the correct dosage of 0.25 mg. However, given the client's heart rate of 54/min, administering the medication could further lower the heart rate, which can be dangerous. The nurse should withhold the medication and notify the physician.
Choice B reason: Withholding the digoxin dose for decreased heart rate is the correct action. Digoxin is used to slow down the heart rate and strengthen heart contractions. A heart rate of 54/min is considered bradycardia (slow heart rate), and administering digoxin could exacerbate the bradycardia, leading to potential complications such as heart block or severe arrhythmias. Therefore, it is critical to withhold the medication and inform the physician of the client's current heart rate.
Choice C reason: Administering one tablet of digoxin 0.125 mg would not provide the full prescribed dose of 0.25 mg. More importantly, the client's low heart rate makes it unsafe to administer any dose of digoxin at this time.
Choice D reason: Withholding the digoxin dose for elevated blood pressure is not appropriate. Although the client has elevated blood pressure (144/96), the more immediate concern is the low heart rate. Digoxin affects heart rate more than blood pressure, and the risk of exacerbating bradycardia takes precedence.
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A reason: Completion of antibiotic therapy does not necessarily correlate with a decrease in the risk of infection in burn patients. While antibiotics can help manage existing infections, the risk for new infections remains until the burn wounds are fully healed. Open burn wounds provide a portal of entry for pathogens, and the presence of necrotic tissue can further increase infection risk.
Choice B reason: Returning albumin levels to normal can improve the overall nutritional status and healing process of a burn patient, but it does not directly reduce the risk of infection. Albumin levels are more indicative of the patient's nutritional status and fluid balance. The primary concern for infection risk remains the open burn wounds, which serve as a direct route for pathogens.
Choice C reason: Completion of the fluid resuscitation process is crucial for stabilizing a burn patient's hemodynamic status and ensuring adequate perfusion to tissues. However, fluid resuscitation does not directly impact the risk of infection. The risk of infection is predominantly related to the presence and extent of open burn wounds.
Choice D reason: The correct response is that the risk for infection significantly decreases when all of the burn wounds have closed. Closed wounds provide a barrier against pathogens and reduce the risk of infection. Wound closure can be achieved through natural healing or surgical interventions such as skin grafting. Until the wounds are fully closed, the patient remains at a high risk for infection.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.