The nurse is assessing a client for goiter and is unable to observe the thyroid gland. Which action should the nurse take?

A. At six weeks post-hysterectomy, a focused assessment that addresses the specific concerns related to the surgery and recovery would be more appropriate. A full physical examination might be too broad for this purpose, although aspects of it might be included if specific issues are identified.
B. A Pap smear is typically not required during a post-surgical follow-up for a hysterectomy unless there is a specific reason to screen for cervical cancer. In many cases, especially if the hysterectomy was for benign reasons and the cervix was removed, Pap smears might not be necessary.
C. This approach is highly relevant for a post-surgical evaluation. Gathering information about the client’s activities since surgery helps assess the recovery process, identify any issues or complications, and provide appropriate advice for ongoing care. Activities might include physical activity levels, adherence to post-surgical instructions, any new symptoms, and overall well-being.
D. A comprehensive review of systems is a thorough approach to identifying any potential issues across various body systems. While this can be useful in some cases, it may be more extensive than necessary for a routine follow-up after a hysterectomy.

A. A grade IV systolic murmur is considered loud and may be associated with a palpable thrill. In mitral valve regurgitation, the murmur is often best heard at the apex of the heart. A thrill, which is a vibration felt on the chest wall, is a sign of a more significant murmur. This description is consistent with a grade IV murmur, which is typically loud and may indeed be associated with a thrill.
B. Very loud, with no stethoscope, thrill easily palpable, heave visible.
B. A grade V systolic murmur is very loud and can be heard with the stethoscope barely touching the chest. It often comes with a palpable thrill and may be accompanied by a visible heave or lift of the

chest wall. This description is consistent with a grade V murmur, not grade IV. Therefore, it’s not the
correct description for a grade IV murmur.
C. A soft murmur, barely audible, describes a grade I or grade II systolic murmur. This does not match the characteristics of a grade IV murmur, which is louder and more easily heard. Therefore, this description does not support a grade IV murmur.
D. A moderately loud murmur, without a thrill, could describe a grade III murmur. Additionally, a "machine-like rumble" is more characteristic of a diastolic murmur, such as those heard in conditions like aortic regurgitation or mitral stenosis, rather than a systolic murmur associated with mitral valve regurgitation.