Which client would be a candidate for Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)?
A severely depressed client with history of a brain tumor
A client with severe, long-lasting depression
A client with mild depression
A severely depressed client with congestive heart failure
The Correct Answer is B
A. A history of a brain tumor does not automatically exclude a person from ECT, but it requires careful consideration and evaluation. It would be essential to conduct a thorough assessment, including imaging studies and consultations with specialists, to ensure that ECT would be safe and appropriate in this context.
B. This option is a strong candidate for ECT. ECT is particularly effective for individuals with severe, treatment-resistant depression, especially when other interventions such as medication and psychotherapy have not been successful. ECT is often considered when depression is severe, persistent, and significantly impairs functioning or poses a risk to life.
C. ECT is generally not indicated for mild depression. The treatment is typically reserved for more severe cases where other forms of treatment have failed or when rapid response is necessary. Mild depression can often be managed effectively with psychotherapy, medication, or a combination of both, without the need for ECT.
D. While ECT can be considered for individuals with severe depression and underlying medical conditions, congestive heart failure (CHF) adds a layer of complexity. However, ECT can still be considered if the potential benefits outweigh the risks, and if the patient is carefully monitored and managed by a multidisciplinary team.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
A. This principle relates to protecting patient information. It is not relevant to this scenario.
B. This principle respects the patient's right to self-determination. By disregarding the client's preference for walking with her daughter, the nursing assistant violated the client's autonomy.
C. This principle involves doing good for the patient. While the nursing assistant might have intended to benefit the client by encouraging exercise, it was done at the expense of the client's autonomy.
D. This principle involves avoiding harm to the patient. While the client was upset, there is no evidence of physical harm in this situation.
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
A. This is an inappropriate and potentially harmful response. Restraints should be used as a last resort and only under specific circumstances. In this case, they are not necessary and could escalate the situation.
B. Attempting to reason with an agitated client is unlikely to be effective and could further escalate the situation.
C. Seclusion should be used as a last resort and only under specific circumstances. In this case, it is not necessary and could increase the client's agitation and sense of isolation.
D. This is the most appropriate response as it sets a clear boundary, gives the client time to calm down, and allows the nurse to return when the situation is more stable.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.