Which nursing intervention has priority as a client diagnosed with anorexia nervosa begins to gain weight after initiated therapy?

Choice A rationale:

While it's true that the nurse has released the client's information without their explicit consent, this action is justified under the duty to warn and protect.

This duty supersedes the general obligation to maintain confidentiality when there's a serious and imminent threat to identifiable individuals or the public.

In this case, the client's verbal threat to bomb a local church constitutes a credible and foreseeable risk of harm, necessitating the breach of confidentiality to protect potential victims.

Choice B rationale:

Although the nurse's actions may help to avoid malpractice charges by demonstrating responsible care and adherence to ethical obligations, this is not the primary reason for notifying the minister.

The primary goal is to avert harm and fulfill the duty to warn, not to shield oneself from legal liability.

Choice C rationale:

This is the correct answer. The nurse has acted in accordance with the duty to warn and protect, which is a legal and ethical obligation in healthcare.

This duty mandates that healthcare professionals take reasonable steps to warn potential victims and protect the public when a patient communicates a serious threat of harm.

Choice D rationale:

While confidentiality is a cornerstone of healthcare ethics, it's not absolute.

The duty to warn and protect allows for limited breaches of confidentiality when necessary to prevent serious harm, as in this case.

The nurse's actions align with ethical principles and legal requirements, even though they involve disclosing confidential information.

Choice A rationale:

Deflecting the client's concerns to the physician dismisses the client's immediate need for emotional support and therapeutic communication.

It can hinder the development of a trusting nurse-client relationship.

The nurse is responsible for addressing the client's psychosocial needs, not solely deferring them to other healthcare professionals.

Choice B rationale:

Offering false reassurance is inappropriate and potentially harmful. It can erode trust if the client's fears are later realized.

It minimizes the client's legitimate concerns and invalidates their emotional experience.

Choice C rationale:

While lifestyle modifications are essential for managing coronary artery disease, providing unsolicited advice at this moment disregards the client's emotional distress.

It prioritizes physical health over the client's psychological well-being. It can be perceived as dismissive of the client's fears and concerns.

Choice D rationale:

Inviting the client to elaborate on their fears demonstrates active listening and encourages therapeutic communication. It validates the client's concerns and shows empathy for their emotional experience.

It provides an opportunity to assess the client's understanding of their condition and identify specific fears or misconceptions. It establishes a foundation for exploring coping mechanisms and providing appropriate support and education.