Which of the following are reasons to conduct a health history using an interpreter? (Select all that apply)
To increase the client’s satisfaction with care.
To decrease the cost of care.
To increase the accuracy of the communication.
To increase the self-esteem of the client.
The Correct Answer is A
Choice A reason: Using an interpreter enhances client satisfaction by ensuring clear communication, respecting language needs, and fostering trust. This improves patient engagement and care quality, critical for positive healthcare experiences. Accurate language support prevents misunderstandings, ensuring clients feel heard and valued, especially in diverse populations with language barriers.
Choice B reason: Interpreters increase initial costs due to service fees, not decrease them. The focus is on communication accuracy and satisfaction, not cost reduction. Assuming cost savings misaligns with interpreter use, risking neglect of language needs, which could lead to errors or dissatisfaction in patients with limited English proficiency.
Choice C reason: Interpreters increase communication accuracy by bridging language gaps, ensuring precise health history collection and reducing errors in diagnosis or treatment. This is critical for safe, effective care in non-English-speaking patients, preventing misinterpretations that could compromise health outcomes and patient safety in clinical settings.
Choice D reason: While interpreters may indirectly support self-esteem by respecting language needs, this is not a primary reason for their use. Accuracy and satisfaction are key. Assuming self-esteem is the focus risks prioritizing emotional over practical needs, potentially neglecting communication accuracy critical for effective health history and care planning.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A reason: The trigeminal nerve (V) controls facial sensation and chewing, not smell, which is governed by the olfactory nerve (I). Misidentifying this risks incorrect neurological assessment, potentially missing olfactory deficits indicating brain injury or tumors, critical for accurate diagnosis and management in patients with sensory complaints.
Choice B reason: The optic nerve (II) governs vision, not smell, which is the olfactory nerve’s function (I). Assuming optic involvement misguides cranial nerve assessment, risking oversight of olfactory dysfunction, which may signal neurological conditions like Parkinson’s or trauma, requiring targeted evaluation and intervention in clinical practice.
Choice C reason: The olfactory nerve (I) is responsible for the sense of smell, transmitting sensory input from the nasal mucosa to the brain. Accurate identification ensures proper neurological assessment, detecting deficits that may indicate trauma, tumors, or neurodegenerative diseases, guiding diagnosis and treatment in patients with smell-related complaints.
Choice D reason: The vestibulocochlear nerve (VIII) controls hearing and balance, not smell, which is the olfactory nerve’s role (I). Misidentifying this risks incorrect assessment, potentially overlooking olfactory issues signaling neurological pathology, delaying diagnosis and management critical for addressing sensory deficits in clinical neurological evaluations.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A reason: Inspection, palpation, and auscultation is incorrect, as palpation before auscultation can alter bowel sounds by stimulating peristalsis. Abdominal assessment requires auscultation first to capture natural bowel activity, followed by palpation to avoid disrupting the acoustic findings critical for diagnosing conditions like obstruction.
Choice B reason: Inspection, auscultation, and palpation is the correct sequence for abdominal assessment. Inspection identifies visible abnormalities, auscultation captures unaltered bowel sounds, and palpation assesses tenderness or masses. This order prevents palpation from affecting auscultatory findings, ensuring accurate evaluation of gastrointestinal function and potential pathologies.
Choice C reason: Auscultation, inspection, and palpation disrupts the logical flow of abdominal assessment. Inspection should precede auscultation to note visible abnormalities that may guide listening. Starting with auscultation risks missing contextual visual cues, reducing the effectiveness of the assessment and potentially overlooking critical signs.
Choice D reason: Palpation, auscultation, and inspection is incorrect, as palpation first can stimulate or suppress bowel sounds, skewing auscultation results. Inspection must initiate the process to identify visible issues, followed by auscultation and palpation, to maintain accuracy in assessing abdominal conditions like peritonitis or organ enlargement.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.