The nurse is assessing an older adult’s orientation. Which question is most appropriate?

Choice A reason: Warm, dry skin is a normal finding, reflecting adequate circulation and hydration, expected in healthy integumentary assessments. It’s not concerning unless accompanied by fever or dehydration. Assuming this is unexpected risks overcomplicating care, diverting focus from actual abnormalities like pressure injuries requiring intervention in skin assessments.

Choice B reason: A clear IV site without drainage is expected, indicating no infection or infiltration. Unexpected findings involve redness or leakage. Assuming this is abnormal risks unnecessary interventions, diverting attention from true integumentary issues like pressure injuries, critical for preventing complications in patients with prolonged IV therapy.

Choice C reason: A stage 1 pressure injury, with non-blanchable erythema, is an unexpected and concerning finding, indicating early tissue damage requiring intervention like repositioning or pressure relief. Unlike normal skin findings, this signals risk of progression, necessitating prompt documentation and care to prevent worsening ulcers in vulnerable patients.

Choice D reason: Skin color consistent with racial heritage is expected and normal, reflecting genetic pigmentation. Unexpected findings involve changes like pallor or cyanosis. Assuming this is abnormal risks misinterpretation, neglecting actual integumentary issues like pressure injuries, critical for accurate assessment and timely intervention in skin health.

Choice A reason: This statement is objective, describing observable clinical findings such as facial drooping and slurred but understandable speech with appropriate word choices. It avoids speculative diagnoses, adhering to medical documentation standards that prioritize factual, measurable data. Neurological assessments often note such symptoms, which may indicate conditions like stroke or Bell’s palsy, but the statement remains descriptive, allowing for accurate clinical interpretation.

Choice B reason: Stating “the client is having a stroke” is a definitive diagnosis, which is inappropriate for a medical record without confirmatory diagnostic tests like a CT scan or MRI. Stroke involves cerebral ischemia or hemorrhage, causing symptoms like facial droop, but documentation must avoid premature conclusions to prevent misdiagnosis and ensure proper clinical evaluation.

Choice C reason: This statement is subjective, focusing on the observer’s difficulty understanding speech and using vague terms like “asymmetrical.” It lacks specificity about speech clarity or word choice, which are critical in neurological assessments. Objective documentation should quantify symptoms, such as degree of asymmetry or speech intelligibility, to support accurate medical decision-making.

Choice D reason: This statement speculates a causal link between drooping mouth and speech difficulty without evidence, using “probably,” which is inappropriate for medical records. It lacks detail on speech quality or other neurological signs. Accurate documentation requires precise, objective observations to guide diagnosis, such as noting specific symptoms without assuming unconfirmed etiologies.