Which of the following assessments should be included in a post fall prevention assessment of an older adult? (Select all that apply.)

A. Stroke under the chin in a downward motion.
Explanation: Stroking under the chin in a downward motion is not considered a standard technique for managing dysphagia. It's important to focus on strategies that promote safe swallowing and prevent aspiration.

B. Keep pulse oximeter ready at all times.
Explanation: While monitoring oxygen saturation is important in certain situations, having a pulse oximeter ready at all times may not be a routine instruction for feeding a client with dysphagia. Monitoring for signs of distress and ensuring a safe feeding environment are key aspects of care.

C. Avoid rushing the client or force feeding her.
Explanation: Rushing or force-feeding a client with dysphagia can increase the risk of aspiration. It's important to allow the client to eat at their own pace and take adequate time to chew and swallow safely.

D. If facial weakness is present, place food on the impaired side of the mouth.
Explanation: Placing food on the impaired side of the mouth can help compensate for facial weakness and promote more effective chewing and swallowing.

E. Alternate solid and liquid boluses.
Explanation: Alternating solid and liquid boluses can help with the overall coordination of the swallowing process. It can also facilitate the movement of food and liquids through the digestive tract.

F. Have the client sit at 90 degrees during all of oral intake.
Explanation: Ensuring that the client sits at a 90-degree angle during oral intake helps promote an upright position that aids in swallowing and reduces the risk of aspiration.

A. Four-length rails.

Explanation: Four-length rails fully enclose the bed and can be considered a more restrictive measure. They may be used when a restraint order is in place, but for an alert patient without such an order, less restrictive alternatives are preferred.

B. One-length rail.

Explanation: Using one-length rails can be a less restrictive alternative when a patient is at high risk for falling. The use of one side rail allows for some protection against falls without fully restraining the patient. This approach helps maintain the patient's mobility and autonomy while still providing a safety measure.

C. Two full-length rails.

Explanation: While using two full-length rails is less restrictive than four-length rails, it is still more restrictive than using only one side rail. The goal is to balance fall prevention with the patient's autonomy.

D. No side rails.

Explanation: Using no side rails may not provide adequate protection for an alert patient at high risk for falling. While avoiding restraints is essential, implementing at least one side rail is a reasonable compromise to enhance safety without fully restricting the patient's movement.