A client is recovering in the critical care unit following a cardiac catheterization.
Intravenous (IV) nitroglycerin and heparin are infusing.
The client is sedated but responds to verbal instructions.
After changing positions, the client complains of pain at the right groin insertion site.
Which action should the nurse implement?
Check femoral site for hematoma formation.
Stimulate the client to take deep breaths.
Evaluate the integrity of the IV insertion site.
Assess distal lower extremity capillary refill.
The Correct Answer is A
Choice A rationale:
Checking the femoral site for hematoma formation is the most appropriate action in response to the client's complaint of pain at the right groin insertion site after a cardiac catheterization. Hematoma formation is a potential complication of this procedure and can lead to further complications if not addressed promptly. Checking for hematoma allows the nurse to assess for bleeding and take appropriate measures to manage it.
Choice B rationale:
Stimulating the client to take deep breaths is not the most immediate action needed in this situation. While deep breathing is important for respiratory function, the client's pain at the groin site requires immediate assessment to rule out complications.
Choice C rationale:
Evaluating the integrity of the IV insertion site is not the primary concern in this case. The client's pain is localized to the groin site, which is where the cardiac catheterization was performed. Checking for hematoma formation at this site takes precedence.
Choice D rationale:
Assessing distal lower extremity capillary refill is important for assessing peripheral perfusion, but it is not the most immediate action needed when a client complains of pain at a specific site, such as the right groin insertion site after a cardiac catheterization. Checking for hematoma and assessing for bleeding should come first.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A rationale:
Systemic autoimmune vasculopathy is not a typical underlying disease pathology associated with a waddling gait and frequent falls in a 5-year-old child. This choice is not relevant to the symptoms described.
Choice B rationale:
Autonomic neuropathy may manifest with a variety of symptoms, including autonomic dysregulation, but it is not a common underlying pathology leading to a waddling gait and frequent falls in a child. This choice is not relevant to the symptoms described.
Choice C rationale:
Impaired neuron function can result in various neurological symptoms, but it does not specifically explain the waddling gait and frequent falls in a 5-year-old child. This choice is not relevant to the symptoms described.
Choice D rationale:
Muscle fiber degeneration is the most appropriate explanation for the symptoms of a waddling gait and frequent falls in a 5-year-old child. These symptoms are indicative of a neuromuscular disorder known as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), which involves progressive muscle weakness and degeneration. DMD is characterized by the loss of muscle fibers and is a common cause of a waddling gait and falls in affected children. Therefore, choice D is the correct answer based on the understanding of the underlying disease pathology.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A rationale:
The combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole has a synergistic effect, which means that the two drugs work together to inhibit bacterial growth more effectively than either drug alone. This combination is commonly used to treat urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by susceptible bacteria.
Choice B rationale:
The combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole does not have an additive effect that reduces the dosage and frequency of administration of each drug. Instead, it is prescribed as a fixed combination with specific dosages of each drug.
Choice C rationale:
The combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole does not have an antagonistic effect that prevents the development of resistance to either drug. In fact, the combination is chosen because it covers a broader spectrum of bacteria and reduces the likelihood of resistance development.
Choice D rationale:
The combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole does not have a selective effect that targets only the bacteria causing the UTI and spares the normal flora. It affects a wide range of bacteria, including both pathogenic and normal flora.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.