A client with paranoia is admitted to the mental health unit and immediately goes to the corner of the room and sits quietly without communicating. In approaching the client, what intervention should the practical nurse (PN) implement first?

Choice A reason:

Instructing the UAP in the correct removal of contaminated gloves focuses only on one aspect of the PPE removal process. While it is important to remove gloves correctly to prevent contamination, this choice does not address the comprehensive handling of all isolation attire. Proper PPE removal involves multiple steps, including the removal of gowns, masks, and gloves in a specific order to minimize the risk of contamination.

Choice B reason:

Reminding the UAP to remove the gown before removing gloves addresses part of the PPE removal process but not the entire procedure. The correct sequence for removing PPE is crucial to prevent self-contamination. However, this choice does not ensure that all steps are followed correctly. The PN needs to confirm that the UAP understands and correctly performs the entire process, not just one step.

Choice C reason:

Advising the UAP to remove the mask after exiting the room is incorrect because masks should be removed before leaving the isolation room to prevent contamination of the environment outside the isolation area. Droplet precautions require that masks be removed inside the room to contain any infectious agents within the isolation area. This choice could lead to the spread of infection if not followed correctly.

Choice D reason:

Confirming that the UAP has correctly handled the isolation attire ensures that all steps in the PPE removal process are followed correctly. This comprehensive approach helps maintain infection control standards and prevents the spread of infectious agents. By verifying that the UAP has correctly removed and disposed of all PPE, the PN ensures that the UAP adheres to proper protocols, thereby protecting both the healthcare workers and other clients.

This is the finding that the PN should document as evidence that the amount of insulin is inadequate for the client with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Consecutive evening serum glucose greater than 260 mg/dL indicates hyperglycemia, which means that the client's blood sugar is too high and not well controlled by the insulin dose. The PN should report this finding to the healthcare provider and expect a possible adjustment in the insulin regimen.