The client is a 58-year-old male who wants to be screened for diabetes mellitus. The client has a sister who has type 2 diabetes. He has a history of depression, which is treated with paroxetine 10 mg orally every day. The client also states that he occasionally takes cannabis in edible form. He denies smoking or drinking. He works In a chemical factory where he is occasionally exposed to fumes. The client's BMI is 28.

Which of the following indicates an understanding? (Select all that apply)

Pilocarpine ophthalmic drops are used to treat glaucoma by reducing intraocular pressure. They do not have an anesthetic effect and are not used for the purpose of numbing or anesthetizing the eyes. It is important for the client to have a correct understanding of the medication and its intended use.
Here's why the other options are incorrect:

A. Reassure the client that the drops will not be needed often since eye pain in glaucoma is not common: This statement is not accurate. While eye pain may not be a common symptom of glaucoma, pilocarpine drops are primarily used to reduce intraocular pressure, not to address eye pain.
B. Reteach the client about the action of the eye drops to decrease pressure in the eyes: This option may be considered if the client misunderstood the information initially, but it is not the most appropriate response in this scenario. The client's statement indicates a specific belief about the drops providing anesthetic effects, so clarifying the purpose of the drops is more appropriate.
C. Document in the chart that the client understands the action and use of the eye drops: Documentation is important, but in this case, it is necessary to address the client's misconception about the anesthetic effect of the drops and provide accurate information.

In cases of suspected child abuse, inconsistencies or discrepancies between the child's account of the injury and the caregiver's version are concerning. It raises questions about the credibility of the explanation provided by the caregiver and suggests a possible attempt to conceal the true cause of the injury. Such discrepancies may indicate that the injury was intentionally inflicted or that the child is being coerced or influenced to provide a false account.
While the other assessment findings may raise some level of concern, they are not as significant as the discrepancy between the child's and mother's versions of the injury:
A. "The mother refuses to answer questions about family history." While this behavior may raise some suspicion or cause for further investigation, it alone does not conclusively indicate child abuse. It may be related to other factors such as privacy concerns or cultural differences.
B. "The child has several abrasions on the chest and legs." While the presence of abrasions can be concerning, they alone do not provide sufficient evidence of child abuse. Children are prone to injuries and can obtain abrasions during normal play and activities.
C. "The child looks at the floor when answering the nurse's questions." This behavior may suggest shyness, anxiety, or discomfort, but it is not a definitive indicator of child abuse. Some children may exhibit such behaviors due to their personality or other factors unrelated to abuse. It is important to consider the child's overall behavior and communication patterns in conjunction with other assessment findings.