A nurse is assessing a client who was placed in restraints for aggressive behavior. The client is now calm and cooperative. Which of the following actions should the nurse take?

Choice A reason: Comparing the medication label to the provider’s prescription three times is a safety step during administration, not reconciliation. Reconciliation verifies the client’s home medications against new orders to prevent errors like omissions or duplications. This action occurs post-reconciliation, focusing on administration accuracy, not the initial verification of the medication list.
Choice B reason: Medication reconciliation involves comparing the client’s home medication list to admission prescriptions to ensure continuity and accuracy. This process identifies discrepancies, such as missed medications or incorrect doses, preventing adverse drug events. It requires verifying with the client or family and cross-checking provider orders, making it the cornerstone of safe transitions in care settings.
Choice C reason: Administering medications to treat a condition to the actual prescriptions is unclear and not part of reconciliation. Reconciliation focuses on verifying and documenting medications, not administering them. This option does not align with the systematic process of ensuring all medications are correctly prescribed upon admission, making it incorrect.
Choice D reason: Ensuring administration within 3 hours of the scheduled time relates to medication administration protocols, not reconciliation. Reconciliation verifies the accuracy of the medication list before administration. This step is about timing, not the verification process critical to preventing errors during care transitions, rendering it irrelevant to the task.

Choice A reason: Encouraging a final hemodialysis treatment contradicts the client’s advance directives, which refuse life-sustaining treatments. Respecting autonomy is paramount, and persuading the client undermines their decision, making this action unethical and inappropriate in this end-of-life scenario.
Choice B reason: Contacting the family to discuss the decision is unnecessary unless the client is incapacitated, which is not indicated. The client’s advance directives guide care, and family input is secondary to the client’s wishes, making this action incorrect and irrelevant.
Choice C reason: Discussing treatment options with the surrogate is inappropriate, as the client is competent and has clear advance directives refusing treatment. The surrogate’s role applies only if the client cannot decide, making this action misaligned with the client’s autonomy and directives.
Choice D reason: Discussing discharge options respects the client’s refusal of treatment and advance directives, focusing on palliative care or home arrangements. This supports autonomy and aligns with end-of-life care principles, ensuring comfort and dignity, making it the correct action.