A nurse is assisting with the care of a client.

Vital Signs.

1330: Temperature 36.8 °C (98.2 °F) Heart rate 88/min.

Respiratory rate 16/min.

Blood pressure 110/64 mm Hg. 1345: Oxygen saturation 96% on 3 L/min via simple face mask.

Temperature 37 °C (98.6 °F) Heart rate 112/min.

Respiratory rate 20/min.

Blood pressure 108/60 mm Hg. 1400: Oxygen saturation 94% on 3 L/min via simple face mask.

Temperature 38.3 °C (101 °F) Heart rate 152/min.

For each data collection finding, click to specify if the finding is consistent with malignant hyperthermia, latex allergy, or hypovolemic shock.

Each finding may support more than 1 disease process.

Choice A rationale:

Placing the client's arms raised above her head with her legs elevated on pillows (choice A) is not the correct position for a lumbar puncture. This position does not facilitate proper alignment of the spine and may hinder the procedure.

Choice B rationale:

The Trendelenburg position with the body in Sims' position (choice B) is not the correct position for a lumbar puncture. This position is not commonly used for lumbar punctures and may not provide the necessary anatomical alignment for a successful procedure.

Choice C rationale:

Placing the client prone with her arms at her side and her legs extended (choice C) is not the appropriate position for a lumbar puncture. This position does not allow for proper access to the lumbar region and may impede the procedure.

Choice D rationale:

The correct position for a lumbar puncture is to have the client flex their head to the chest and pull their knees up to the abdomen (choice D) This position maximizes the space between the lumbar vertebrae, making it easier for the provider to access the subarachnoid space for cerebrospinal fluid collection.

Choice A rationale:

An entry on a nursing blog, while potentially informative, does not provide the same level of evidence-based information as a peer-reviewed journal article. Blog posts may not undergo rigorous peer review and may lack the scientific rigor and credibility associated with peer-reviewed research. Therefore, choice A is not the best source for evidence-based information.

Choice B rationale:

Information from a wound care product vendor may be biased and influenced by commercial interests. Vendors often aim to promote their products, and the information they provide may not be impartial or based on rigorous scientific research. Therefore, choice B is not the best source for evidence-based information.

Choice C rationale:

A peer-reviewed journal article is considered one of the most reliable sources of evidence-based information in healthcare. Such articles undergo a thorough review process by experts in the field to ensure the accuracy, quality, and validity of the research findings. Peer-reviewed articles provide credible and up-to-date information based on scientific research and are widely recognized as a gold standard in evidence-based practice. Therefore, choice C is the correct answer as it offers the best evidence-based information.

Choice D rationale:

First-hand experience with wound care products, while valuable, may not necessarily provide the most comprehensive or up-to-date information. Personal experiences can vary, and healthcare practices evolve over time based on research and new evidence. Therefore, choice D is not the best source for evidence-based information.