A nurse is attending to a client with a peripheral vascular access device who is experiencing pain, redness, and swelling at the site. What action should the nurse take to alleviate the pain after removing the device?

Rationale for Choice A:
A shift to the left in the white blood cell (WBC) count indicates an increased presence of immature neutrophils, known as bands. This is a hallmark sign of infection, as the body is rapidly producing and releasing these cells to fight off invading pathogens.
Prompt notification of the primary health care provider is crucial to initiate timely antibiotic therapy, if indicated. Early intervention with appropriate antibiotics can effectively combat the infection, prevent its progression, and potentially avert serious complications.
Delaying antibiotic treatment can allow the infection to worsen, potentially leading to sepsis, septic shock, or other life- threatening conditions.
Rationale for Choice B:
While informing the client about the significance of a shift to the left is important for education and understanding, it does not address the immediate need for medical intervention.
The priority action is to involve the primary health care provider for prompt assessment and potential initiation of antibiotic therapy.
Rationale for Choice C:
Documenting findings and continuing to monitor the client's condition is essential for ongoing assessment and evaluation, but it does not constitute a proactive intervention to address the underlying infection.
Documentation alone does not initiate treatment, and monitoring without intervention risks allowing the infection to progress.
Rationale for Choice D:
Protective isolation is not routinely indicated for clients with a shift to the left in their WBC count unless there is a specific concern for transmission of a highly contagious infection.
The decision to implement protective isolation measures would be based on the client's overall clinical presentation and potential infectious risks, as determined by the primary health care provider.

Choice A rationale:
Explaining legal requirements to inform sex partners at this initial stage is not the most appropriate or supportive intervention.
The client is in a state of emotional distress and may not be receptive to information about legal obligations. It's crucial to first address the client's emotional needs and provide support before discussing legal matters.
Prematurely focusing on legalities could further overwhelm the client and potentially hinder the development of a trusting relationship with the nurse.
Choice C rationale:
Offering to inform the family for the client, while well-intentioned, may not respect the client's autonomy and right to privacy. The decision to disclose HIV status to family members is a personal one that should be made by the client, not the nurse.
It's important to empower the client to make their own choices about disclosure and provide support throughout the process.
Choice D rationale:
Determining if a clergy member would help could be a valuable resource for some clients, but it should not be the first or only intervention.
It's essential to first assess the client's individual needs and preferences regarding spiritual support.
Not all clients may find comfort in religious or spiritual guidance, and some may prefer to seek support from other sources.
Choice B rationale:
Assessing the client for support systems is the most appropriate initial intervention because it focuses on the client's immediate needs for emotional support and connection.
By identifying existing support systems (such as family, friends, or community organizations), the nurse can help the client access resources that can provide comfort, understanding, and assistance in coping with the diagnosis.
This approach recognizes the client's emotional state and prioritizes their psychosocial well-being, which is essential in the initial stages of coping with an HIV diagnosis.