A postoperative client vomited. After cleaning and comforting the client, which action by the nurse is most important?
Document the episode
Encourage the client to eat dry toast
Allow the client to rest
Auscultate lung sounds
The Correct Answer is D
Rationale for Choice A:
Documentation is essential for communication and continuity of care, but it is not the most immediate priority in this situation.
The nurse should document the episode of vomiting, including the time, amount, and characteristics of the vomitus, as well as any associated symptoms or interventions.
However, auscultating lung sounds should be done first to assess for potential aspiration, which is a more urgent concern.
Rationale for Choice B:
Offering dry toast may be appropriate after the nurse has assessed for aspiration and determined that it is safe for the client to resume oral intake.
However, it is not the most important action at this time.
The nurse should first assess the client's respiratory status and address any potential complications.
Rationale for Choice C:
Rest is important for healing and recovery, but it is not the most immediate priority in this situation. The nurse should first assess the client's respiratory status and address any potential complications. Once the client is stable, the nurse can then encourage rest.
Rationale for Choice D:
Auscultating lung sounds is the most important action for the nurse to take after a client vomits.
This is because aspiration of vomitus is a serious complication that can lead to pneumonia, respiratory distress, and even death.
By auscultating lung sounds, the nurse can assess for signs of aspiration, such as crackles, wheezing, or diminished breath sounds.
If aspiration is suspected, the nurse can initiate appropriate interventions, such as suctioning, oxygen therapy, and positioning the client to facilitate drainage of secretions.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A rationale:
Assessing the patient's adherence to the drug regimen is the most crucial first step in this situation. Here's a comprehensive explanation:
1. Significance of Adherence in HIV Treatment:
Viral Suppression and Disease Progression: Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is paramount in HIV management. It directly impacts viral suppression, preventing disease progression, and reducing the risk of opportunistic infections and complications. Non-adherence can lead to viral rebound, increased viral load, and potential disease advancement.
Primary Cause of Treatment Failure: Suboptimal adherence is the leading cause of treatment failure in HIV patients. It can result in:
Reduced effectiveness of ART Development of drug resistance Increased healthcare costs Increased risk of transmission
2. Rationale for Prioritizing Adherence Assessment:
Direct Link to Viral Load and Health Status: A sudden decline in health status and a significant increase in viral load strongly suggest potential non-adherence. Assessing adherence early on can:
Identify the root cause of the clinical deterioration
Inform timely interventions to address adherence barriers Prevent further complications
3. Assessing Adherence Thoroughly:
Non-Judgmental Approach: Creating a supportive and non-judgmental environment is essential for honest and accurate assessment.
Open-Ended Questions: Utilize open-ended questions to explore potential challenges and barriers to adherence, such as: Difficulties with medication schedules
Side effects Financial constraints Forgetfulness
Mental health concerns Substance abuse
Lack of social support
Objective Measures: Complement patient reports with objective measures like:
Pill counts
Pharmacy refill records
Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS)
4. Addressing Adherence Barriers:
Tailored Interventions: Based on the assessment findings, develop individualized strategies to enhance adherence, such as: Simplifying medication regimens
Addressing side effects
Providing medication reminders
Offering counseling and support services
Connecting patients with resources
5. Reassessing and Monitoring:
Continuous Evaluation: Regularly reassess adherence and viral load to ensure treatment effectiveness and make adjustments as needed.
Conclusion:
While other options (B, C, D) may provide valuable information, prioritizing adherence assessment is critical to promptly identify and address potential adherence issues, optimize treatment outcomes, and prevent further health decline in HIV patients experiencing viral rebound.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A rationale:
Leukocyte-poor packed red blood cells (LP-PRBCs) have a significantly reduced number of white blood cells (WBCs), also known as leukocytes. This is crucial for pre-transplant patients like the one in the question for several reasons:
Prevention of Alloimmunization: WBCs in blood transfusions carry human leukocyte antigens (HLAs), which are proteins on the surface of cells that play a role in the immune system. Exposure to foreign HLAs can cause the recipient's immune system to develop antibodies against them, a process called alloimmunization. These antibodies can then attack and damage the transplanted kidney, leading to rejection. By reducing the number of WBCs in the transfusion, LP-PRBCs significantly lower the risk of alloimmunization.
Reduced Incidence of Febrile Non-Hemolytic Transfusion Reactions (FNHTRs): FNHTRs are the most common type of transfusion reaction, characterized by fever, chills, and occasionally other symptoms like nausea and vomiting. They are thought to be caused by cytokines released from WBCs in the transfused blood. LP-PRBCs, with their reduced WBC content, have been shown to lower the incidence of FNHTRs.
Potential Benefits for Graft Survival: Some studies have suggested that the use of LP-PRBCs for transfusions may improve long-term graft survival rates in kidney transplant patients, although more research is needed to confirm these findings.
Choice B rationale:
This statement is incorrect. While LP-PRBCs may have some advantages in terms of absorption or utilization, this is not the primary reason for their use in pre-transplant patients. The main goal is to reduce the risk of alloimmunization and other transfusion-related complications.
Choice C rationale:
This statement is partially correct. LP-PRBCs do tend to cause fewer blood reactions, particularly FNHTRs, as explained in the rationale for Choice A. However, this is not the most comprehensive or accurate explanation for their use in pre-transplant patients.
Choice D rationale:
This statement is not directly relevant to the use of LP-PRBCs in pre-transplant patients. While LP-PRBCs may have a lower risk of hemolysis, this is not the primary reason for their use in this specific context.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.