A nurse is auscultating a client’s lung sounds and identifies crackles in the left lower lobe. Which intervention should the nurse take first?
Repeat auscultation after asking the client to take a deep breath and cough.
Instruct the client to limit fluid intake to less than 2,000 mL/day.
Place the client on bed rest in semi-Fowler’s position.
Prepare to administer antibiotics.
The Correct Answer is A
Choice A Reason:
Repeating auscultation after asking the client to take a deep breath and cough is the first intervention the nurse should take. This action helps to clear any secretions or mucus that might be causing the crackles. If the crackles persist after the client coughs, it indicates that the sounds are likely due to fluid in the lungs, which requires further assessment and intervention. This step ensures that the nurse accurately identifies the cause of the crackles before proceeding with other interventions.
Choice B Reason:
Instructing the client to limit fluid intake to less than 2,000 mL/day might be appropriate in cases of fluid overload or heart failure, but it is not the first intervention. The nurse needs to confirm the cause of the crackles before making any recommendations about fluid intake. Limiting fluid intake without proper assessment could lead to dehydration and other complications.
Choice C Reason:
Placing the client on bed rest in semi-Fowler’s position can help improve lung expansion and oxygenation by reducing pressure on the diaphragm. However, this is not the first intervention. The nurse should first determine if the crackles are due to secretions that can be cleared by coughing. Semi-Fowler’s position is beneficial for patients with respiratory distress, but it does not address the immediate need to reassess lung sounds.
Choice D Reason:
Preparing to administer antibiotics is not the first intervention. Antibiotics are used to treat infections, and the nurse needs to confirm whether the crackles are due to an infection or another cause before administering medication. Immediate administration of antibiotics without proper assessment could lead to inappropriate treatment and antibiotic resistance.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A Reason:
Defamation of character is incorrect. Defamation of character involves making false statements about someone that damage their reputation. This can be in the form of slander (spoken) or libel (written). Applying restraints without proper justification does not fall under defamation of character.
Choice B Reason:
Invasion of privacy is incorrect. Invasion of privacy involves intruding into someone’s personal life without consent. This can include unauthorized access to personal information or spaces. Applying restraints without proper justification is not an invasion of privacy.
Choice C Reason:
Slander is incorrect. Slander is a form of defamation that involves making false spoken statements that damage someone’s reputation. Applying restraints without proper justification does not involve making false statements.
Choice D Reason:
False imprisonment is correct. False imprisonment involves restraining a person without legal justification or their consent. In a healthcare setting, applying restraints without proper justification or following legal and ethical guidelines constitutes false imprisonment and violates the client’s rights.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Applying compression stockings is a key prophylactic intervention to prevent complications of immobility, such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Compression stockings help improve blood circulation in the legs by applying graduated pressure, which reduces the risk of blood clots forming in the deep veins. This is particularly important for immobile patients who are at higher risk of developing DVT due to prolonged periods of inactivity.
Choice B reason: Raising all side rails is primarily a safety measure to prevent falls and does not directly address the complications of immobility. While it is important for patient safety, it does not have a significant impact on preventing issues like DVT, pressure ulcers, or muscle atrophy. Therefore, it is not considered a prophylactic intervention for immobility-related complications.
Choice C reason: Inserting a urinary catheter is not a prophylactic intervention for preventing complications of immobility. Catheters are used to manage urinary retention or incontinence but can increase the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) if not managed properly. They do not address the primary complications associated with immobility, such as DVT or pressure ulcers.
Choice D reason: Using friction-reducing devices is important for preventing pressure ulcers and skin injuries in immobile patients. These devices help minimize friction and shear forces on the skin, which can lead to pressure ulcers. While this is a valuable intervention, it is not as comprehensive as compression stockings in preventing a range of immobility-related complications.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.