A nurse is caring for a patient after a radical neck dissection.
What should be the nurse’s priority in the immediate postoperative period?

Choice A rationale:

Irrigating the tubing with sterile normal saline solution is not a routine part of closed-wound drainage system care.

It's usually only done if there's evidence of a blockage or infection, and only under the direction of a healthcare provider. Unnecessary irrigation could introduce bacteria into the system and increase the risk of infection.

It could also disrupt the delicate balance of fluids in the wound and delay healing.

Choice B rationale:

Replacing the drainage plug after releasing hand pressure on the device is not correct. The drainage plug should actually be replaced before releasing hand pressure.

This is to prevent air from entering the system, which could disrupt the vacuum and impair drainage.

Choice D rationale:

Emptying the reservoir once per day is not frequent enough.

The reservoir should be emptied whenever it becomes full, which could be more often than once a day, depending on the amount of drainage.

Allowing the reservoir to become too full could put pressure on the wound and impede healing.

Choice C rationale:

Fully re-collapsing the reservoir after emptying it is essential to maintain the vacuum that promotes drainage. If the reservoir is not fully re-collapsed, the vacuum will be lost, and drainage will slow or stop.

This could lead to fluid accumulation in the wound, which could increase the risk of infection and delay healing.

Choice A rationale:

While explaining the importance and rationale of the new policy may be helpful in some cases, it may not be sufficient for nurses who are resistant to change. This approach assumes that the nurse's resistance is due to a lack of understanding, which may not be the case. It's possible that the nurse understands the rationale but has other concerns or objections.

Focusing solely on explaining the rationale can make the nurse feel they are not being listened to or that their concerns are not being valued. This can further contribute to resistance.

Choice B rationale:

Encouraging the nurse to verbalize their reasons for resistance allows the nurse manager to understand the root cause of the resistance. This could include:

Concerns about the effectiveness of the new policy

Belief that the new policy will create more work or make their job more difficult

Feeling that they were not adequately consulted or involved in the decision-making process Personal factors such as fear of change or a preference for established routines

Once the nurse manager understands the nurse's concerns, they can work together to address them and find ways to facilitate acceptance of the new policy. This approach fosters open communication, collaboration, and shared decision-making, which are essential for successful change management.

Choice C rationale:

Indicating disciplinary consequences may be necessary in some cases, but it should be a last resort. It can create a negative and hostile work environment, further alienate the nurse, and potentially lead to resentment and decreased morale among other staff members.

It's important to prioritize understanding and addressing the underlying reasons for resistance before resorting to disciplinary measures.

Choice D rationale:

Ignoring the resistance and relying on peer pressure is a passive and ineffective approach. It does not address the nurse's concerns and may even exacerbate the situation. This can lead to conflict among staff members, create a divide between those who support the change and those who resist it, and potentially compromise patient care.