A nurse is evaluating a client who received intermittent IV fluids. Which of the following findings indicates the client has a fluid overload?

Choice A reason: Hypernatremia is unlikely with 0.45% sodium chloride, a hypotonic solution that dilutes serum sodium. Over-infusion risks hyponatremia, not high sodium levels. Monitoring for hypernatremia is inappropriate, as the solution’s low sodium content does not contribute to elevated sodium in fluid therapy.
Choice B reason: Assessing for fluid overload is essential, as 0.45% sodium chloride, being hypotonic, can cause water to shift into cells, risking pulmonary or cerebral edema. This is critical in clients with renal or cardiac issues, where monitoring for dyspnea or swelling ensures safe fluid administration.
Choice C reason: Hypoglycemia is not directly linked to 0.45% sodium chloride, which affects fluid and electrolytes, not glucose. Fluid shifts may indirectly stress metabolism, but hypoglycemia relates to fasting or insulin issues, making this an inappropriate focus for monitoring in this fluid therapy context.
Choice D reason: Dehydration is unlikely, as 0.45% sodium chloride provides free water, promoting hydration. It corrects hypernatremia or replaces fluid losses. Evaluating for dehydration is unnecessary unless infusion is inadequate or losses persist, which is not indicated in the context of this hypotonic solution.

Choice A reason: Encouraging a final hemodialysis treatment contradicts the client’s advance directives, which refuse life-sustaining treatments. Respecting autonomy is paramount, and persuading the client undermines their decision, making this action unethical and inappropriate in this end-of-life scenario.
Choice B reason: Contacting the family to discuss the decision is unnecessary unless the client is incapacitated, which is not indicated. The client’s advance directives guide care, and family input is secondary to the client’s wishes, making this action incorrect and irrelevant.
Choice C reason: Discussing treatment options with the surrogate is inappropriate, as the client is competent and has clear advance directives refusing treatment. The surrogate’s role applies only if the client cannot decide, making this action misaligned with the client’s autonomy and directives.
Choice D reason: Discussing discharge options respects the client’s refusal of treatment and advance directives, focusing on palliative care or home arrangements. This supports autonomy and aligns with end-of-life care principles, ensuring comfort and dignity, making it the correct action.