A nurse is flushing a client’s intermittent infusion device. The client states, “Why do you have to do that if you are not giving me medicine?” Which of the following statements should the nurse make?
This prevents leakage of fluid and medication.
This helps to keep you hydrated.
This clears blood from the line.
This ensures the device is sterile.
The Correct Answer is C
Choice A reason: Preventing leakage is not the primary purpose of flushing an intermittent infusion device. Flushing maintains patency by clearing blood or medication residue, preventing clots or blockages. Leakage is addressed by proper capping or clamping, not flushing, making this statement incorrect as it misrepresents the procedure’s purpose.
Choice B reason: Flushing an infusion device does not contribute to hydration, as the flush solution (typically saline) is minimal and not intended for fluid replacement. The purpose is to maintain catheter patency by clearing debris or clots. This statement is incorrect, as it inaccurately suggests a hydration benefit unrelated to the procedure.
Choice C reason: Flushing an intermittent infusion device with saline clears blood or medication residue from the catheter, preventing occlusion and maintaining patency. Blood left in the line can clot, increasing infection risk or blocking the device. This statement accurately reflects the procedure’s purpose, ensuring continued functionality for future medication administration.
Choice D reason: Flushing does not ensure sterility, as the device is already in place and exposed to the bloodstream. Sterility is maintained during insertion or access, not flushing. The primary goal is patency, not sterilization, making this statement incorrect as it misaligns with the procedure’s clinical purpose.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A reason: Amputation is not a contraindication for kidney donation, as it does not affect kidney function or surgical risks. Physical disability, if stable, does not preclude donation, so this condition is irrelevant to eligibility, making it incorrect.
Choice B reason: Primary glaucoma does not impact kidney function or donation safety. It is an eye condition unrelated to systemic health risks for donation, so it is not a contraindication, making this an incorrect choice for exclusion.
Choice C reason: Osteoarthritis, if mild, is not a contraindication for kidney donation, as it does not affect renal or surgical outcomes. Severe cases may pose mobility issues, but this is not typical, so it is incorrect as a contraindication.
Choice D reason: Hypertension is a contraindication for kidney donation, as it increases risks of renal damage and cardiovascular complications post-donation. It compromises long-term kidney function, aligning with transplant guidelines, making it the correct condition to identify.
Correct Answer is ["B","D","E"]
Explanation
Choice A reason: Instructing pregnant visitors to stay 3 feet away is insufficient, as radiation from a sealed implant requires greater distance (typically 6 feet) or complete avoidance. Pregnant individuals should not visit to minimize fetal exposure, making this precaution inadequate and incorrect for safety.
Choice B reason: Wearing a lead apron shields the nurse from radiation exposure during close contact with the sealed implant, adhering to ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principles. This protects the nurse while providing care, making it a necessary and correct safety measure.
Choice C reason: Placing the client in a semi-private room is unsafe, as radiation from the implant could expose other patients. A private room is required to minimize radiation risk to others, making this action incorrect and against radiation safety protocols.
Choice D reason: Closing the client’s door reduces radiation exposure to others outside the room, as sealed implants emit continuous radiation. This containment measure, combined with signage, ensures safety for staff and visitors, making it a correct and essential action.
Choice E reason: Limiting visitors to 30 minutes per day minimizes cumulative radiation exposure, protecting visitors from the sealed implant’s emissions. Time restrictions are standard in radiation safety protocols, ensuring minimal risk while allowing controlled visits, making this a correct action.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.