A community health nurse is performing a home visit for a client and is evaluating the home environment for safety. Which of the following findings would indicate to the nurse that the client has a proper understanding of safety in the home?

Choice A reason: Using a cane provides stability and reduces fall risk for clients with multiple sclerosis, who often experience muscle weakness or balance issues. This assistive device promotes safe mobility, aligning with evidence-based safety strategies, making it the correct precaution for home care.
Choice B reason: Walking with feet close together decreases stability, increasing fall risk in multiple sclerosis due to impaired coordination. A wider stance is recommended for balance, making this precaution incorrect and potentially dangerous for the client’s safety.
Choice C reason: Avoiding orthotics is not advisable, as they can support mobility and prevent foot drop in multiple sclerosis. Orthotics improve safety and function, so discouraging their use is counterproductive, making this an incorrect recommendation for home safety.
Choice D reason: A rigorous range-of-motion exercise plan may cause fatigue or injury in multiple sclerosis, where moderated exercise is preferred. Overexertion exacerbates symptoms, so this plan is unsafe and inappropriate, making it incorrect for promoting client safety.

Choice A reason: Explaining the implications of a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status ensures the client understands that no CPR or intubation will occur if their condition deteriorates. This supports informed consent and autonomy, clarifying the scope of DNR to prevent misunderstandings. It respects the client’s decision-making capacity, ensuring their wishes align with end-of-life care preferences.
Choice B reason: Placing a “Do Not Resuscitate” sign outside the room breaches confidentiality under HIPAA, risking unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information. DNR status is communicated via medical records or wristbands. This action is inappropriate, as it does not contribute to implementing the client’s wishes and violates privacy standards, making it an incorrect response.
Choice C reason: Obtaining family consent is unnecessary for a competent client’s DNR request, as autonomy rests with the client. If decisionally capable, their wishes override family input. The nurse’s role is to support the client’s decision, not seek family approval, unless the client is incapacitated, which is not indicated, making this action inappropriate.
Choice D reason: Documenting the DNR request in the medical record ensures the care team follows the client’s wishes, preventing unwanted interventions. Accurate documentation communicates code status, supports legal and ethical standards, and ensures continuity of care. This is critical for aligning treatment with the client’s end-of-life preferences, making it a necessary action.