A nurse is providing teaching to a client who is initiating oral contraceptive use. Which of the following client conditions is a contraindication for oral contraceptive use?

Choice A reason: Providing transportation information is helpful but does not directly coordinate care, as it addresses access rather than securing services. Coordination involves arranging specific care delivery, so this action is supportive but less comprehensive, making it incorrect for demonstrating care coordination.
Choice B reason: Encouraging self-advocacy empowers the client but does not actively coordinate care, which requires arranging services or resources. This action is educational, not logistical, and does not ensure access to health services, making it incorrect for this context.
Choice C reason: Informing about providers who accept insurance is informative but not sufficient for coordination, which involves facilitating actual care delivery. Without arranging services, this action remains preparatory, making it less effective than directly securing an appointment, thus incorrect.
Choice D reason: Arranging an appointment with a mobile health clinic directly facilitates access to care, addressing rural barriers. This active coordination ensures the client receives services, aligning with case management principles for underserved populations, making it the correct demonstration of care coordination.

Choice A reason: Encouraging a final hemodialysis treatment contradicts the client’s advance directives, which refuse life-sustaining treatments. Respecting autonomy is paramount, and persuading the client undermines their decision, making this action unethical and inappropriate in this end-of-life scenario.
Choice B reason: Contacting the family to discuss the decision is unnecessary unless the client is incapacitated, which is not indicated. The client’s advance directives guide care, and family input is secondary to the client’s wishes, making this action incorrect and irrelevant.
Choice C reason: Discussing treatment options with the surrogate is inappropriate, as the client is competent and has clear advance directives refusing treatment. The surrogate’s role applies only if the client cannot decide, making this action misaligned with the client’s autonomy and directives.
Choice D reason: Discussing discharge options respects the client’s refusal of treatment and advance directives, focusing on palliative care or home arrangements. This supports autonomy and aligns with end-of-life care principles, ensuring comfort and dignity, making it the correct action.