A patient has been diagnosed with septic shock.
What collaborative interventions would be expected? (Select all that apply)

Choice A rationale:

Respects patient autonomy: This response directly addresses the patient's preference and demonstrates respect for their right to make decisions about their own care. It empowers the patient by offering a solution that aligns with their stated wishes.

Promotes patient comfort: By accommodating the patient's preference, the nurse can help to create a more comfortable and trusting environment, which can lead to better patient outcomes.

Protects patient privacy: Personal hygiene care often involves exposure of sensitive body parts and can be a source of embarrassment or anxiety for some patients. Ensuring that the patient is comfortable with the gender of the caregiver helps to protect their privacy and dignity.

Demonstrates cultural sensitivity: While not explicitly stated in the question, it's possible that the patient's preference is rooted in cultural or religious beliefs. Being sensitive to these factors is essential for providing culturally competent care.

Provides a practical solution: This response offers a concrete solution that can be easily implemented, ensuring that the patient's needs are met in a timely and efficient manner.

Choice B rationale:

May be perceived as intrusive: Asking the patient to explain their reasoning could make them feel uncomfortable or defensive. It's important to respect the patient's right to privacy and not pressure them to disclose personal information.

Could delay care: While understanding the patient's reasons may be helpful in some cases, it's not essential for providing appropriate care. Delaying care to gather this information could potentially compromise the patient's well-being.

Choice C rationale:

Dismisses patient's concerns: This response fails to acknowledge the patient's preference and could make them feel unheard or disrespected. It's important to validate the patient's feelings and concerns, even if you don't fully understand them.

May not address underlying issues: The patient's preference may be based on factors that are not related to the AP's competence or experience. Simply stating the AP's qualifications is unlikely to resolve the patient's concerns.

Choice D rationale:

Defers responsibility: While informing the charge nurse may be necessary for logistical reasons, it's important for the nurse to take ownership of the situation and address the patient's concerns directly. Deferring to another staff member could make the patient feel like their concerns are not being taken seriously.

May delay care: Involving additional staff members could potentially delay the patient's care. It's more efficient to address the patient's preference directly, if possible.

Choice B rationale:

Checking the patency of the tubing is the first and most crucial step in addressing the lack of urinary output in this patient. Here's a detailed explanation of why this is the priority action:

Addresses the Most Likely Cause: Obstruction of the urinary catheter tubing is the most common and easily reversible cause of sudden cessation of urinary output in a patient with a continuous bladder irrigation system.

Prevents Complications: A blocked catheter can lead to a number of serious complications, including: Bladder distention, which can cause pain, discomfort, and potential bladder damage.

Urinary retention, which can increase the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and kidney damage. Hematuria, or blood in the urine, due to clot formation in the bladder or catheter.

Non-Invasive Intervention: Checking the tubing is a simple, non-invasive procedure that can quickly identify and resolve the issue without requiring further interventions or delays in care.

Prioritizes Patient Safety: It's essential to promptly address any potential urinary obstruction to prevent the aforementioned complications and ensure patient safety.

Rationale for Other Choices:

Choice A: Administering a prescribed analgesic:

While pain management is important, it does not directly address the lack of urinary output. Pain medication would be appropriate if pain were assessed to be the cause of the decreased output, but it's not the first priority in this situation.

Choice C: Notifying the provider:

Although the provider should be informed of the situation, checking the tubing for patency is a necessary first step to gather more information and potentially resolve the issue quickly without requiring further intervention.

Choice D: Offering oral fluids:

Increasing fluid intake might be helpful in some cases of decreased urinary output, but it's not the priority action in a patient with a continuous bladder irrigation system and a potential catheter obstruction.