A nurse is attending to a patient with a bowel obstruction who has been prescribed a nasogastric tube. What steps should the nurse take during the insertion of the nasogastric tube?

Choice A rationale:

Painful urination (dysuria) can be a sign of several conditions that could potentially affect the client's IVP or indicate a need for further assessment. These conditions include:

Urinary tract infection (UTI): UTIs are common in clients with recurrent kidney stones, and they can cause inflammation and pain in the urinary tract. If a client has a UTI, it's important to treat it before the IVP to reduce the risk of spreading the infection to the kidneys.

Kidney stone passage: The client's history of kidney stones makes it possible that the pain could be due to the passage of a stone. This would be important information for the healthcare team to know, as it could affect the interpretation of the IVP results.

Other urological conditions: There are other urological conditions, such as bladder or urethral strictures, that can also cause painful urination. These conditions might also need to be considered and assessed for.

It's important for the nurse to collect more data about the client's painful urination to determine the underlying cause and whether it could impact the IVP. This might include asking questions about:

The severity and duration of the pain

Any other associated symptoms, such as fever, urgency, or frequency The client's history of UTIs or kidney stones

Any recent changes in urinary habits

Based on this additional information, the nurse can then collaborate with the healthcare team to determine the best course of action, which might include:

Further assessment, such as a urinalysis or urine culture Treatment for a UTI, if present

Pain management

Rescheduling the IVP, if necessary

Choice A rationale:

It is crucial for the nurse to prioritize patient safety and adhere to professional guidelines when encountering a potential diversion of controlled substances. Informing the charge nurse is the most appropriate initial action for several reasons:

Chain of Command: The charge nurse holds a supervisory position and is responsible for addressing issues within the unit, including concerns about medication diversion. Reporting suspicions to the charge nurse ensures adherence to the established chain of command and facilitates a prompt, organized response.

Confidentiality and Objectivity: The charge nurse is trained to handle sensitive situations discreetly and objectively. They can initiate a thorough investigation while maintaining confidentiality and protecting the rights of all involved parties.

Access to Resources: The charge nurse has access to resources and authority to take immediate action, such as securing medications, initiating patient assessments, and notifying appropriate personnel within the healthcare facility.

Collaboration and Support: The charge nurse can provide guidance and support to the reporting nurse, ensuring their concerns are addressed appropriately and that they feel safe in coming forward with their suspicions.

Rationale for other choices:

B. Reporting the incident directly to the hospital’s security department might be premature without first informing the charge nurse. The charge nurse can assess the situation, gather more information, and determine the most appropriate course of action, which may or may not involve security at this initial stage.

C. Requesting assistive personnel (AP) to monitor the other nurse’s actions is inappropriate. It places a burden on APs who are not trained or authorized to investigate such matters. It could also compromise the integrity of the investigation and potentially jeopardize patient safety.

D. Confronting the other nurse directly is not recommended. It could escalate the situation, create a hostile work environment, and potentially compromise the investigation. It is essential to follow established protocols and involve appropriate personnel to ensure a fair and thorough investigation.