After teaching a client with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a nurse assesses the client’s understanding. Which menu selection indicates that the client correctly understands the dietary teaching?

Choice A reason: Restricting fluids is contraindicated in burns, as hypovolemia requires aggressive fluid resuscitation. Administering lactated Ringer’s is correct, making this incorrect, as it’s unsafe compared to the nurse’s priority to restore volume in a burn-injured client.

Choice B reason: Dextrose 5% is not used for burn resuscitation, as it lacks electrolytes needed for fluid shifts. Lactated Ringer’s is standard, making this incorrect, as it’s inappropriate compared to the nurse’s focus on proper fluid therapy for burn management.

Choice C reason: Administering oxygen addresses potential airway compromise and hypoxia from facial and chest burns. This aligns with burn care priorities, making it a correct action the nurse would implement to ensure respiratory stability in the emergency department.

Choice D reason: A cooling blanket is not standard for partial-thickness burns; cooling is brief and initial. Elevating extremities reduces edema, making this incorrect, as it’s not a priority action compared to the nurse’s focus on burn injury management.

Choice E reason: Elevating extremities without fractures reduces edema in burned arms, improving circulation. This aligns with burn care protocols, making it a correct action the nurse would implement to manage swelling in the client with partial-thickness burns.

Choice F reason: Oral pain medication is contraindicated with facial burns due to airway risks and absorption issues. IV lactated Ringer’s is appropriate, making this incorrect, as it’s unsafe compared to the nurse’s priority for pain management in burns.

Choice G reason: Administering lactated Ringer’s 1 L bolus restores fluid volume in burn-induced hypovolemia, per resuscitation protocols. This is a correct action the nurse would implement to stabilize the client with partial-thickness burns in the emergency department.

Choice A reason: Sodium of 130 mEq/L indicates hyponatremia, likely from vomiting-induced sodium loss. This aligns with the child’s electrolyte profile and symptoms, making it a correct imbalance the nurse would identify as most likely based on the lab values and clinical presentation.

Choice B reason: Calcium of 9.5 mg/dL is normal, not indicating hypocalcemia. Hyponatremia and metabolic alkalosis match the labs (sodium 130, HCO3 30), making this incorrect, as it does not reflect the child’s electrolyte imbalances from vomiting and irregular pulse.

Choice C reason: Potassium of 3.3 mEq/L is low, not high, ruling out hyperkalemia. Hyponatremia and metabolic alkalosis fit the labs and vomiting history, making this incorrect, as it contradicts the child’s potassium level in the nurse’s assessment of imbalances.

Choice D reason: Potassium of 3.3 mEq/L suggests mild hypokalemia, but hyponatremia (sodium 130) is more prominent with vomiting. Metabolic alkalosis is also evident, making this partially correct but incorrect as the primary imbalance compared to hyponatremia in the child’s profile.

Choice E reason: HCO3 of 30 mEq/L indicates alkalosis, not acidosis, due to vomiting-induced hydrogen ion loss. Hyponatremia and metabolic alkalosis are correct, making this incorrect, as it contradicts the child’s alkalotic state in the nurse’s evaluation of lab values.

Choice F reason: HCO3 of 30 mEq/L indicates metabolic alkalosis, common with vomiting due to loss of acidic gastric contents. This, with hyponatremia, aligns with the child’s labs and symptoms, making it a correct imbalance the nurse would identify in the assessment.