An adult client exhibits an allergic reaction to an Insect bite. The nurse should observe the client's skin for which finding?

Choice A Reason:
Reviewing the client's serum electrolytes is incorrect. While abnormalities in electrolyte levels can sometimes contribute to neurological symptoms, such as paresthesia, reviewing the client's serum electrolytes may not directly identify additional findings consistent with the client's reported paresthesia of the hands and legs. Therefore, this option is less relevant for assessing paresthesia and identifying additional consistent findings.
Choice B Reason:
This is the correct action to identify additional findings consistent with the client's paresthesia. Paresthesia, or abnormal sensations like burning or tingling, may indicate neurological dysfunction. Assessing the client's muscle strength and hand grips can provide valuable information about neurological function and help identify any weakness or changes that may be associated with the paresthesia.
Choice C Reason:
Checking distal phalanges capillary refill is incorrect. Checking distal phalanges capillary refill is important for assessing peripheral circulation, but it may not directly identify additional findings consistent with paresthesia. While impaired circulation could contribute to sensory disturbances, such as paresthesia, it is not always the primary cause. Therefore, this option may not fully capture the sensory aspect of the client's reported symptoms.
Choice D Reason:
While observing the skin for signs of inflammation or irritation is important in assessing for other conditions, such as infection or inflammation, it is not directly related to identifying additional findings consistent with paresthesia. Paresthesia primarily involves abnormal sensations and neurological function rather than changes in the skin.

Choice A Reason:
Normal mental status for age is incorrect. This choice would not be the most accurate conclusion based on the client's response. While it's possible that the client's response could be influenced by factors such as cultural background or personal interpretation, the inability to understand the metaphorical meaning of a commonly known proverb might suggest some level of cognitive impairment or difficulty with abstract thinking. Therefore, it would be premature to conclude that the client's response reflects a normal mental status for her age.
Choice B Reason:
Impaired concentration is incorrect. Impaired concentration would manifest as difficulty maintaining focus our attention during the interaction. However, the client's response doesn't suggest a lack of attention or focus. Instead, it indicates a misinterpretation of the proverb, which is more indicative of impaired thinking or difficulty understanding abstract concepts rather than impaired concentration.
Choice C Reason:
Impaired memory is incorrect. Impaired memory would typically involve difficulty recalling information or events from the past. In this scenario, the client is able to recall the phrase "Glass Houses" but demonstrates difficulty understanding its meaning. Therefore, impaired memory is not the most appropriate conclusion based on the client's response. Instead, the response suggests impaired thinking or difficulty with abstract reasoning.
Choice D Reason:
Impaired thinking is correct. The client's response indicates difficulty understanding the metaphorical meaning of the proverb "Glass Houses," which typically implies that those who live in fragile or vulnerable situations should avoid criticizing others, as they themselves are also vulnerable to criticism or judgment. Instead, the client's response focuses on the literal interpretation of the phrase, suggesting impaired thinking or difficulty grasping abstract concepts.