To assess a client's pupillary reaction to accommodation, what action should the nurse take?

Choice A Reason:
Observing for jugular vein distention while the client is flat in bed is incorrect because jugular vein distention is not directly related to orthopnea. Jugular vein distention may indicate increased central venous pressure, which can occur in conditions such as heart failure, but it is not specific to orthopnea, which is difficulty breathing while lying flat.
Choice B Reason:
Measuring the client's blood pressure when he is lying and standing is incorrect because measuring blood pressure in different positions (lying and standing) is used to assess for orthostatic hypotension, not orthopnea. Orthostatic hypotension refers to a drop-in blood pressure upon standing and is not directly related to difficulty breathing while lying flat.
Choice C Reason:
Asking the client how many pillows he sleeps on at night is correct because orthopnea is characterized by difficulty breathing while lying flat, often relieved by sitting up or propping oneself with pillows. Asking the client how many pillows he sleeps on at night provides valuable information about his sleeping position and potential orthopnea. Clients with orthopnea often need to sleep in a semi-upright position or with multiple pillows to alleviate breathing difficulties.
Choice D Reason:
Auscultating the client's breath sounds while he is supine is incorrect because auscultating the client's breath sounds while he is supine may provide information about lung sounds, but it does not specifically assess for orthopnea. Orthopnea refers to difficulty breathing while lying flat, and the assessment of breath sounds may not directly indicate this condition.

Choice A Reason:
Listening while the client reads items listed on the menu is inappropriate. This approach involves assessing the client's speech while they read items listed on the menu. While reading aloud can provide some insight into speech patterns, it may not fully capture spontaneous speech or natural conversation. Additionally, reading may not necessarily assess other aspects of speech such as articulation, fluency, or coherence. Therefore, while this approach can offer some information, it may not be as comprehensive as observing speech during a natural conversation or interview.
Choice B Reason:
Asking the client to complete a common proverb or saying is inappropriate. Asking the client to complete a common proverb or saying is a task that assesses language comprehension and expression. While this approach may provide some insight into the client's ability to formulate and articulate speech, it may not fully capture spontaneous speech patterns or natural conversation. Additionally, completing proverbs or sayings may require specific cultural knowledge or cognitive abilities that could influence the assessment. Therefore, while this approach can be useful in certain contexts, it may not be as comprehensive as observing speech during a natural conversation or interview.
Choice C Reason:
Noting the client's responses during the initial interview is appropriate. Option C involves observing the client's speech patterns during the initial interview, which provides the nurse with an opportunity to assess spontaneous speech, articulation, fluency, and coherence. During the initial interview, the nurse can assess the client's ability to express thoughts, respond to questions, and engage in conversation, which can reveal any abnormalities or difficulties in speech patterns. This approach allows for a comprehensive assessment of speech without requiring specific tasks or prompts that may be more challenging or unfamiliar to the client.
Choice D Reason:
Having the client repeat a phrase containing alliteration is inappropriate. Asking the client to repeat a phrase containing alliteration is a task that assesses speech articulation and phonological skills. While this approach may provide some information about the client's ability to produce specific sounds or syllables, it may not fully capture spontaneous speech patterns or natural conversation. Additionally, repeating phrases with alliteration may not necessarily assess other aspects of speech such as fluency, coherence, or language comprehension. Therefore, while this approach can be useful for assessing specific speech skills, it may not be as comprehensive as observing speech during a natural conversation or interview.