To assess a client's pupillary reaction to accommodation, what action should the nurse take?

Choice A Reason:
Splint the affected joint is inappropriate action. While splinting may help stabilize the joint and reduce movement, it may not directly address the underlying cause of the symptoms, which is9levated uric acid levels leading to gout. Additionally, splinting may further restrict range of motion and exacerbate discomfort.
Choice B Reason:
Encouraging fluid intake is appropriate action. Encouraging fluid intake, particularly water, is beneficial for individuals experiencing a gout flare-up. Adequate hydration helps to dilute uric acid in the bloodstream and promote its excretion through urine, which can help alleviate symptoms and prevent further flare-ups. Therefore, option B is the most appropriate action for the nurse to advise the client in this situation.
Choice C Reason:
Increasing intake of red meat is inappropriate action. Red meat is high in purines, which can contribute to elevated uric acid levels and increase the risk of gout flare-ups. Therefore, increasing intake of red meat would not be advisable for someone experiencing gout symptoms. In fact, dietary modifications often involve reducing intake of purine-rich foods like red meat to help manage gout.
Choice D Reason:
Measuring urine output is inappropriate action. While monitoring urine output is important for overall hydration status, it may not be the most immediate or relevant action in this situation. The priority in managing a gout flare-up is to address the underlying cause by promoting uric acid excretion through adequate hydration, rather than solely focusing on measuring urine output.

Choice A Reason:
Sending the sample for laboratory evaluation is incorrect. Sending the urine sample for laboratory evaluation is a standard procedure to assess for any abnormalities, such as urinary tract infections (UTIs), kidney function, or other urinary tract disorders. While laboratory evaluation of the urine sample is important for diagnostic purposes, the client's difficulty providing an adequate urine sample suggests an underlying issue that needs to be addressed before obtaining a sample.
Choice B Reason:
Giving the client 8 ounces (236.5 mL) of water to drink is incorrect. Offering the client water to drink is a common intervention to encourage urine production and facilitate urine sample collection, particularly if the client is dehydrated or has difficulty producing a sample. However, given the client's symptoms of lower abdominal discomfort, frequent urination, and difficulty providing a urine sample despite efforts, simply offering water may not adequately address the underlying issue of potential bladder distention.
Choice C Reason:
Evaluating the client for bladder distention is correct. The client's symptoms of lower abdominal discomfort, frequent urination, and difficulty providing a urine sample after an extended period of time, along with returning with only a few drops of urine, are suggestive of potential bladder distention. Evaluating the client for bladder distention involves assessing for signs such as a visibly enlarged and palpable bladder, suprapubic discomfort or pain, and percussion of the bladder to assess for dullness, indicating fluid accumulation. Addressing bladder distention is essential to ensure the client's comfort and prevent complications associated with urinary retention.
Choice D Reason:
Instructing the client to attempt to urinate again is incorrect. Instructing the client to attempt to urinate again may be a reasonable intervention if the bladder is not distended and the client is simply having difficulty producing a urine sample. However, given the client's symptoms and the difficulty providing an adequate urine sample despite previous attempts, simply instructing the client to try again may not address the underlying issue of potential bladder distention. Evaluating for bladder distention is necessary to determine the appropriate course of action and ensure the client's comfort and safety.