Building L is shorter than Building X. Building Y is shorter than Building L, but Building M is shorter than Building Y. therefore, Building is shorter than Building J. What premise must be added to require the conclusion to be true, assuming all of the premises are true?

A. This advertisement clarifies that only those that want to look younger should buy the product: This is not an accurate critical evaluation. The advertisement doesn't limit the target audience to only those who want to look younger; it simply suggests the product may help with that.
B. The name of the product indicates the product contains healthy ingredients: The product name, Neutrasplash, does not necessarily indicate anything about the ingredients or their health benefits. This statement is a speculative assumption, not a critical evaluation of the advertisement.
C. The phrase "helps prevent" eliminates any promises about the performance of this product: This is the best evaluation. The use of "helps prevent" is a vague phrase that does not guarantee the product’s effectiveness. It suggests that the product might offer some benefit, but it doesn’t make a firm promise, making the advertisement less definitive about its performance.

D. This advertisement gives several good reasons for purchasing the product: This is not true. The advertisement does not provide any concrete reasons or evidence for purchasing the product; it only makes a general claim about preventing lines and wrinkles without offering specific details or proof.

A. consider your past experiences with the candidate: While your past experiences may influence your feelings about the candidate, they do not directly help you analyze or evaluate the article's argument. It’s important to focus on the substance of the article itself, not personal biases or prior interactions with the candidate.
B. refute the opinions presented in the article: Refuting the opinions presented in the article may be an option later, but it should not be your initial step. First, it’s crucial to understand and evaluate the argument being made, rather than simply disagreeing with it outright.
C. identify the personal importance of the regulation: While understanding how the regulation personally affects you can be valuable, it is not the primary step in evaluating the argument. A well-rounded evaluation requires you to assess the merit of the argument itself, not just how it might impact you personally.
D. focus your attention on the argument being made: This is the best approach. To draw a fair and informed conclusion about the article, you should first focus on the argument presented within it. Analyze the reasoning, evidence, and claims made about the new air traffic control regulations, and only then form a reasoned opinion or conclusion.