In a debate regarding solutions to the rising costs of health care, several points of view are communicated. In order to make an informed decision about the issues, what should a consumer do?
Consider the advantages and disadvantages of each solution.
Determine why people have so many opinions.
Realize that it is impossible to sort through so many viewpoints.
Interview each person who has a different viewpoint.
The Correct Answer is A
A. Making an informed decision requires critical thinking and weighing the pros and cons of each possible solution. This approach helps consumers evaluate credibility, feasibility, and personal impact.
B. Determining why people have so many opinions may be interesting but does not directly help in making an informed decision.
C. Realizing that it is impossible to sort through so many viewpoints reflects a defeatist attitude and discourages critical thinking, which is essential in informed decision-making.
D. Interviewing each person who has a different viewpoint is impractical and unnecessary. A consumer can access and evaluate different perspectives through research and credible sources without personally interviewing everyone.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
A. justify the opinions presented in the televised debate: While justifying opinions is important, the student needs to first evaluate and understand all perspectives before forming or justifying their own opinion.
B. engage in a debate with others: Engaging in a debate may help deepen understanding, but it’s not the first step in forming a reasoned decision. The student needs to evaluate the issue from various viewpoints first.
C. accept the views of the most qualified expert: While expert opinions are valuable, it is essential to critically evaluate multiple viewpoints to make an informed decision, rather than simply accepting one authority’s view.
D. consider all points of view. In order to make a reasoned decision, the student must critically consider different perspectives on the topic, including scientific evidence, ethical considerations, and the arguments from both sides of the debate.
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
A. consider stoplights important: While it is reasonable to assume that police officers might consider stoplights important as part of maintaining the law, the original statement does not directly imply this. It focuses on the legality of running a stoplight rather than the officers' personal views.
B. believe it is illegal to run a stoplight: The statement implies that police officers enforce the law, but it doesn’t necessarily indicate what they believe. The focus is more on their role in maintaining the law rather than their personal belief about the law.
C. may issue a ticket if you run a stoplight: This is the best interpretation. Since the statement mentions that police officers maintain the law and that running a stoplight is illegal, it logically follows that police officers may take action, such as issuing a ticket, if someone violates this law.
D. never run stoplights: This is not a valid conclusion. The statement does not make any claims about the actions of police officers in relation to stoplights, only their role in enforcing the law. They may run stoplights, but they would be subject to the same legal consequences as anyone else.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.