Consider the statement: "If anything is a rose, then that thing smells sweet." Which of the following statements provides the best interpretation of the statement?
If anything smells sweet, then it is a rose.
Roses smell sweet.
Things don't smell sweet unless they are roses.
One thing smells as sweet as a rose.
The Correct Answer is B
A. If anything smells sweet, then it is a rose: This is the reverse of the original statement. The original statement only claims that roses smell sweet, not that all things that smell sweet are roses.
B. Roses smell sweet: This is the best interpretation of the statement. The original statement says, "If anything is a rose, then it smells sweet." This means roses, by definition, smell sweet. It is a direct implication of the original statement.
C. Things don't smell sweet unless they are roses: This is an incorrect interpretation. The original statement doesn’t claim that only roses smell sweet, just that if something is a rose, it will smell sweet. The reverse is not true.
D. One thing smells as sweet as a rose: This introduces a comparison that isn't part of the original statement. The original statement doesn't compare the sweetness of things; it just states that roses themselves smell sweet.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
A. the horses in the study were racehorses and the findings do not apply to horses in general: The study specifically involved racehorses, so this statement is true, but it doesn’t directly address the core finding of the study, which is the relationship between iron-rich diet and increased track speed.
B. iron rich feed is associated with an increased track speed in racehorses: The study shows that 75% of the horses showed improved track speed after receiving an iron-rich diet, indicating an association between the two variables.
C. regulations regarding the type of dietary intake for racehorses should be enforced: The study doesn’t suggest that regulations are necessary; it only shows an association. The study does not provide enough information to make regulatory recommendations.
D. regular, non-iron enriched feed causes decreased track speed in racehorses: The study does not discuss non-iron-enriched feed or make any claims about its effect on racehorse speed. The study only examined the effects of an iron-rich diet, not the comparison with other types of feed.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
A. If anything smells sweet, then it is a rose: This is the reverse of the original statement. The original statement only claims that roses smell sweet, not that all things that smell sweet are roses.
B. Roses smell sweet: This is the best interpretation of the statement. The original statement says, "If anything is a rose, then it smells sweet." This means roses, by definition, smell sweet. It is a direct implication of the original statement.
C. Things don't smell sweet unless they are roses: This is an incorrect interpretation. The original statement doesn’t claim that only roses smell sweet, just that if something is a rose, it will smell sweet. The reverse is not true.
D. One thing smells as sweet as a rose: This introduces a comparison that isn't part of the original statement. The original statement doesn't compare the sweetness of things; it just states that roses themselves smell sweet.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.